I don't know how to post various quotes in one reply, so bear with me. He posted all of his successes and listed one thing he used. Which, happens to be the one we are talking about. I think he would be the first to tell you it is part of a system. It's like a car engine.You can have all of the internal parts, all of the external parts, but without a battery it won't start. The battery is part of the system. No, I wouldn't find it funny if a list of big deer killed was used as a reason why "product X" works so well. If it had a negative impact, I would doubt he would have the list of deer to show us.
Personally, you know I believe it works, and NO, I don't have official scientific documents to show you to back it up. But, I don't think it is the only reason I kill deer. I killed deer without it as well, but my deer sightings and the proximity I am to them has improved greatly. I attribute that to the suit, if that's not good enough evidence for you, I'm sorry.
Bowhunters killed a great many deer before the intoduction of the compound bow too. Hey, even before commercially available broadheads as well. I guess the point is, if you really want to get down to the brass tax of it, all we NEED is a stick and string with a rock on the end of it. I don't choose to do it that way. I choose to use every available advantage at my disposal, just as the early pioneers did. Theirs weren't as "technologically advanced" but I assure you they used every advantage they could find.
I agree, the cough silencer is useless. See, we're not so different after all.