Anyone with a brain in their head can see by reading the thread that I asked shed33 to prove his claims about carbon and the things he stated in his first reply that mentioned me. He then asked me to "prove" something and I said "you first".............doesn't take too much brain power to figure out I meant prove what I asked first before asking for proof yourself

Random stories are useless info...........1,000 other guys on here can tell stories of deer they killed without scent suits and where does that leave us?? Nowhere.

Random stories are just that.........you choose to believe them or not........but they offer absolutely no concrete proof of any kind either for or against the subject. I would say the same thing to a guy who says "I killed 50 deer downwind and I don't use scent suits" So what??..........that doesn't prove scent suits don't work anymore then shed33's resume proves that they do. That is what scientific studies are for...........to eliminate any guesswork or variables that can bring doubt into play and require a certain amount of blind faith.

A story is a story................take the contest for example. Some people's scores on their bucks were right in line with what you would think the buck scored..........some were a little lower or higher.........and some were just plain laughable. Some you believe......some you don't and some you laugh at. Anyone can write anything on the internet............doesn't mean it's true