HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - hunting different states
View Single Post
Old 08-18-2005 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
ShatoDavis
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default RE: hunting different states

You told me to get a clue. So I did, this is from the "Montana Department of Tourism: http://travelmontana.mt.gov/Strategic%20Plan%20Final/Final_pdf/Chap%202_Existing%20Conditions%20FINAL.pdf
A. Statewide Socio-Economic Trends
Montana is the fourth largest state in the U.S., encompassing 145,552 square miles, and is
home to only 902,000 citizens, or 6.2 people per square mile (2000 Census). Yet Montanans
hosted nearly 9.5 million nonresident visitors in 2001. Those nonresidents spent $1.7 billion in
Montana, helping to make tourism and recreation the state’s second largest industry.
So you say that all tourism:
B.1 Nonresident Visitation Grew 46% from 1990-2000; Seasonality is a Challenge
For the purposes of this document, the terms “visitor” and “tourist” are interchangeable,
and refer to both residents and nonresidents who travel for leisure or business purposes, taking
money they earned in one place, and spending it elsewhere. The number of nonresidents
visiting Montana rose 46% from 1990 to 2000 (Figure 2.4), compared to 85% growth in lodging
sales (Figure 2.5). However, the number of summer visitors declined from 1996 to 2001.
Economic Impact of Hunting & Fishing
(Source: Montana FWP)
Sportsmen in Montana spent substantial dollars in 2000 on transportation, food,
lodging, guide fees and other items (Table 2.2). The average non-guided, nonresident hunter
has an economic impact of $1,600 per trip to Montana, while a guided hunter has a $3,800
impact (total of $200 million in 2000).
So You want to Foot the bill:
Nonresidents support a significant share of Montana’s fish and game management
efforts: two-thirds of all fiscal year 2000 hunting/fishing license revenue to FWP came from
nonresidents. Additionally, 43% of the entire FWP Department’s total 2001 revenue came from
nonresident hunting/fishing license sales. So, if the number of nonresident sportsmen declines,
the FWP budget will decline, or resident sportsmen will have to make up the loss in revenue.
ShatoDavis is offline  
Reply