ORIGINAL: silentassassin
Sounds more like a lease than an outfitter to me
Actually that's what it is but I am still hunting through an outfitter.
The type of outfitting I was concerned with was the type where a guide goes out and does all the work pre-season, sets you in the stand in the morning, and you wait for the shot. Perhaps I should have been a bit more specific.
I say yes.
It didnt make a diffrence last year . Whats next apoll on if we can use a lazer rangefinder or sight pins . Some people have an advantage becuase they can afford a better bow or stand or can get more time off .
So lets have a poll; Do you think if you have a bow worth more then $400 should you be in the contest.
A outfitted hunt is not a sure thing .
And no I have never been on a guided hunt for deer.
I wasn't sure at first whether I wanted to touch this one or not, but I suppose I may as well. Just because one hunter spends more money on a bow than another doesn't necessarily mean he/she has an advantage. With the new technology we've come out with in recent years, the $300 bows are shooting just as well as the $800 bows. I'm not exactly sure that I'm seeing the connection you're trying to make anymore.
Again, and hopefully for
the last time, this poll was started out of curiosity.
In no way shape or form will the rules be changed because of it. Those of you taking it seriously and thinking that you or someone else may be excluded from the contest because of it can rest at ease.
You will be able to participate.