HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Hoyt VS. Reflex
View Single Post
Old 05-28-2005 | 05:49 AM
  #16  
nodog
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default RE: Hoyt VS. Reflex

ORIGINAL: snowman69

nodog, if jamac220 was like me and visited the site to read post to get tips etc for along time before sighning up then what he said does say alot, or for all you no he has changed his screen name and maybe he had more post than you. There is no need to insult people.
It was just a joke. Kind of a way of getting to know each other. Meant no offense. The smiley face wasn't a sneer. Sorry man.

ORIGINAL:As for what was said about its the shooter that makes the bow not the other way around, I would have to disagree with you IMO its more true than it is false I think that the best shooters out there could take a lower end bow and as long as he had it tuned he could shoot just as good as someone with his same skill shooting a top end bow.
A lower end bow will not stay tuned long, does not consider comfort as the higher ones do and is not engineered the same, but If the bow is tuned then it's part of the equation is complete and if the shooter is good then that part is taken care of as well. Nothing left but the arrow. A lower end bow will fatigue anybody more quickly. Just holding one for a length of time is tiring. I know I have some and one high end bow. Put a good set up in the hands of someone who thinks he shoots poorly and they will most likely shoot better and become a good shooter. Most don't have equipment that is set right and blame their poor shooting on themselves. I'm a lower end kind of guy and proud of it, but it does get tiring.
nodog is offline  
Reply