HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .243 vs. 30-30
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2005 | 01:55 PM
  #82  
oldelkhunter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: .243 vs. 30-30

This is a pretty funny thread.. I might point out that the 30/30 has been elevated to the status of a dangerous game rifle only on this thread. Maybe for the conditions the original poster said would a 30/30 equal a 243 in effectivness . An aquaintance of mine had a Sako finwolf in 243 winchester and used it in a heavily wooded area in NY state. He loved that gun and its effectivness on deer. Had he sat on the edge of a field or right away somewhere he would have been right at home as well. In my mind a 30/30 is a 150 yard gun no more no less. In varying terrain the 243 can be used at 300 yards easily on deer. Some people use it on larger game and I will bet that more 243's kill Elk every fall then do 30/30's. On average it is a better overall deer cartridge. What would be wrong in using a 243 on black bear . On the east coast its a short range prop anyway and with the correct bullet it will work long or short. Drop figures on ballistic tables don't lie when the range exceeds rock throwing.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Reply