You have to admit that any supposed "scientific" report that has flamboyant adjectives within every other sentence has to be taken with a grain of salt. I do believe the article draws some realistic conclusions, but any PHD worth his salt writing a paper to support observed findings would lay off the descriptive and leading narrative and add some actual supporting data.

I believe the good Dr. Ed Ashby misrepresents himself as having a doctorate in physics when he clearly is using a phd in English to write such a supporting document for his clear personal feelings. Not saying he's wrong .. just saying he didn't clearly represent all the facts.