I am not qualified to calculate the number nor are you. You are also not qualified to conclude that a 44% reduction in the antlerless license allocation will result in a further reduction in density because you can only guess what it may be now.
As always you are entitled to your opinion ,which you can't support with facts , but you are not qualified to state that I am not qualified to reach the conclusions I id ,because you don't know me or the sources of information I might have.
Furthermore,don't blame me for the fact that the PGC is in a lock down mode and refuses to release the data like it did prior to 2004. When they anounced the anterless allocations there was no mention of how much the herd has been reduced and they have yet to release the 2004 ANNUal Wildlife Report even though the other reports are available on line for that year.
The 2005 anterless allocations are still the sixth highest number ever issued. When you factor in the effects of the concurrent season and extended seasons , the allocation is equivalent to the fourth highest anterless allocation so the slight reduction in the anterless allocations is nothing to cheer about.