I just find it interesting that in this entire thread, you have tried to justify your action by claiming that I called you a liar... I have yet to see any place that I called you a liar.

All I have done is asked questions but you have attacked and assumed that they were attacks...

Again, the whole thing interests me... how people can view every issue in such black and white ways...

How so many believe that following the law means that they are moral and ethical.

In most instances, to be ethical, a person must hold themselves to a standard which is higher than the legal minimum.

For example, a lawyer that attacks a rape victim on the stand over and over because he doesn't have any other way of getting his client off is still within the legal bounds of his of his profession but was he moral and ethical?

How about the people that helped slaves fleeing the south? They were intentionally breaking the law but were they not morally correct?

Again, allowing yourself to think and have a discussion without immeadiately trying to take the 'moral and high ground' might have made this an interest thread.

However, from the get go, you climbed up on that soap box and started the preaching.

SA