chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
12-23-2004, 11:52 AM
#131
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: summerville sc USA
Posts: 76
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
ORIGINAL: quiksilver
Who fired first would weigh heavily into my decision.
Who fired first would weigh heavily into my decision.
Well Quick, in this case it seems Vang Fired first and then the decision for him to kill everyone there was easy. He did not want any witnesses.
The facts are that bodies were found spread through out the woods. That S.O.B. chased a 20 yr old boy down and shot him 4 times in the back!
You're position on this is so poorly argued on this I can only come to one of two conclusions-
1- you are palying devils advocate for some sick reason
or
2- your daddy needs to get a refund from that law school you attended!
12-23-2004, 12:17 PM
#132
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: minnesota USA
Posts: 411
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
ORIGINAL: onebullet
ya just reaffirmed why i hate lawyers- you talk outta both sides of your mouth but ya dont listen[:'(][:@]
??? what the diference between a jack-ass and a certain wanna-be lawyer?????
jack knows hes an ass!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
guys dont feed the a$$hole he thrives on it- i am going to block all quicks postings hes made his point then changed it to suit him- ignore the wanna-be no matter what you say he will take the opposite view-
-------------------------------------------
ya just reaffirmed why i hate lawyers- you talk outta both sides of your mouth but ya dont listen[:'(][:@]
??? what the diference between a jack-ass and a certain wanna-be lawyer?????
jack knows hes an ass!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
guys dont feed the a$$hole he thrives on it- i am going to block all quicks postings hes made his point then changed it to suit him- ignore the wanna-be no matter what you say he will take the opposite view-
-------------------------------------------
12-23-2004, 12:20 PM
#133
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 477
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
ORIGINAL: rem7400 2
Well Quick, in this case it seems Vang Fired first and then the decision for him to kill everyone there was easy. He did not want any witnesses.
The facts are that bodies were found spread through out the woods. That S.O.B. chased a 20 yr old boy down and shot him 4 times in the back!
You're position on this is so poorly argued on this I can only come to one of two conclusions-
1- you are palying devils advocate for some sick reason
or
2- your daddy needs to get a refund from that law school you attended!
ORIGINAL: quiksilver
Who fired first would weigh heavily into my decision.
Who fired first would weigh heavily into my decision.
Well Quick, in this case it seems Vang Fired first and then the decision for him to kill everyone there was easy. He did not want any witnesses.
The facts are that bodies were found spread through out the woods. That S.O.B. chased a 20 yr old boy down and shot him 4 times in the back!
You're position on this is so poorly argued on this I can only come to one of two conclusions-
1- you are palying devils advocate for some sick reason
or
2- your daddy needs to get a refund from that law school you attended!
well put
12-23-2004, 12:23 PM
#135
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 477
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
ORIGINAL: quiksilver
Not posting a picture of the ACCUSED? That's right, you have no regard for their rights.
Not posting a picture of the ACCUSED? That's right, you have no regard for their rights.
i dont think his intent was tto focus on the accussed. who gives a s**t anbout the accusseds rights. i dont. he killed 8 hunters in cold blood.
12-23-2004, 12:25 PM
#136
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 477
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
quote:
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
quote:
Perhaps you should reread my post.I was quoting Quiksilver who was defending the guy.If you had read all of the previous posts you would have realized that I don't believe any of the B.S. that the defense is claiming.If you had read the previous posts you would also know that Wisconsin does not have the death penalty.Control your emotions and read before you post as you are attacking people that basically feel as you do about the entire incident.
quote:
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
quote:
Further, that crime scene was tampered with by the property owners before law enforcement officials arrived.
I've heard that Chi was threatened by the group, and was fired upon while walking away.
I've heard that Chi was threatened by the group, and was fired upon while walking away.
You have heard a lot.Have you heard any proof to back up any of it?What do you expect someone accused of several murders to say?Do you belive for a minute that he wouldn't lie?
seriously, wheres your proof, and tell me that you honestly belive that bullsh**. just because he was fired on once, doesnt mean he had the right to shoot every one of them, especially in the back
if i feel threatend, thenthat means i can shoot everyone i see? he even ran some of the guys down and shot them, some as far as 100yds, tell me he felt threatened
i hope he gets what he deserves, the DETH PENALTY. i dont care if he is mentally insane.i think that is probably the most commonly used excuse in murder trials
if i feel threatend, thenthat means i can shoot everyone i see? he even ran some of the guys down and shot them, some as far as 100yds, tell me he felt threatened
i hope he gets what he deserves, the DETH PENALTY. i dont care if he is mentally insane.i think that is probably the most commonly used excuse in murder trials
Perhaps you should reread my post.I was quoting Quiksilver who was defending the guy.If you had read all of the previous posts you would have realized that I don't believe any of the B.S. that the defense is claiming.If you had read the previous posts you would also know that Wisconsin does not have the death penalty.Control your emotions and read before you post as you are attacking people that basically feel as you do about the entire incident.
oops sorry. i thought u were defending vang. my bad[
][&o] i hate people who are so blind that they defend people like this(vang)
12-23-2004, 12:36 PM
#137
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin/Michigan
Posts: 9,679
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
Here's Vang's rights.....
The Miranda Rights
You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law.
You have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning.
If you cannot afford an attorney, the state appoints one for you free of charge if you wish.
Oh I'm sure he know this already my bad!
The Miranda Rights
You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law.
You have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning.
If you cannot afford an attorney, the state appoints one for you free of charge if you wish.
Oh I'm sure he know this already my bad!
12-23-2004, 01:06 PM
#138
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 477
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
how can quicksilver call himself a sportsman?(and if he isnt a sportsman, than what is he doing on this site?) no true sportsman, would defend a man who killed 8 people (men and WOMEN) in cold blood.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
lets just say for a second that the deceased did call him racial names and make racial comments about him. and they shot at him AS HE WAS LEAVING that still doesnt give the right to shoot them in self defense. what were they doing, hurting him with their words. (because they sure didnt hurt him with their bullet) in order for it to be lawful for him to shoot them , they would have had to shoot at him first, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. not just one of them. he has no case, even if his rights were violated. tell me he felt threatened. he ran some down for as far as 100 yds before shooting them 4 TIMES IN THE BACK.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
lets just say for a second that the deceased did call him racial names and make racial comments about him. and they shot at him AS HE WAS LEAVING that still doesnt give the right to shoot them in self defense. what were they doing, hurting him with their words. (because they sure didnt hurt him with their bullet) in order for it to be lawful for him to shoot them , they would have had to shoot at him first, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. not just one of them. he has no case, even if his rights were violated. tell me he felt threatened. he ran some down for as far as 100 yds before shooting them 4 TIMES IN THE BACK.
12-23-2004, 01:39 PM
#140
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
RE: chi vang attorneys will use self defense and
There you all go again, jumping to WILD conclusions
Were you there?? Or did somebody tell you that, and you assume it to be an accurate account of what happened? You might want to rethink before you speak. What you so loosely refer to as "facts" are hotly disputed eyewitness accounts.
Wow, I see no need to respond to this baloney- Maybe you should move to another country.
It doesn't?????
Man, I wouldn't want you guys sitting on a jury deciding my fate. You make you judgments before you know anything about the case.
Well Quick, in this case it seems Vang Fired first and then the decision for him to kill everyone there was easy. He did not want any witnesses.
The facts are that bodies were found spread through out the woods. That S.O.B. chased a 20 yr old boy down and shot him 4 times in the back!
The facts are that bodies were found spread through out the woods. That S.O.B. chased a 20 yr old boy down and shot him 4 times in the back!
who gives a s**t anbout the accusseds rights.
...and they shot at him AS HE WAS LEAVING that still doesnt give the right to shoot them in self defense
Man, I wouldn't want you guys sitting on a jury deciding my fate. You make you judgments before you know anything about the case.