Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
#62
RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
you should read this article. This guy claims the .243 to be the best drop'em in their tracks caliber. "The ultimate deer cartridge"
and heres some testamonials.
http://www.udarrell.com/ultimate_deer_cartridge.htm
and heres some testamonials.
http://www.udarrell.com/ultimate_deer_cartridge.htm
#63
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 28
RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
Rather than enter into this argument about velocity vs. energy ect. I choose a rifle on the application. Heavy brush or pine thickets, I use a Marlin 444. In semi open fields or extended shooting lanes .308. For open long distance hunting like Montana I think a 270 would do the trick.
I have no scientific data to back this up but it just seems logical to me.
I have no scientific data to back this up but it just seems logical to me.
#64
RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
and heres some more testamonlials
http://www.udarrell.com/ultimate_deer_cartridge_guests.htm
http://www.udarrell.com/ultimate_deer_cartridge_guests.htm
#69
RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
Velocity is just part of the energy just as bullet weight is. You can't seperate or pick between the two. Big slow bullets kill as do fast smaller bullets assuming that there is enough sectional density to promote penetration. Big fast bullets was Roy Weatherby's answer to this debate. Recoil was the down side. To me of all the vaiables, sectional density is what controls the result. That is its one of the most critical components to the equation. I pick my bullet by matching the sectional density of the bullet to the size and tennacity of the target animal. About 210 to 260 for deer size game. 260 to about 300 for Elk and moose size game and 300 on up for bigger heavier game. This is a rule of thumb but it works well for me. I have killed game with rifles from the 22-250 to the 45-70. The common denominator is always, SHOT PLACEMENT.