RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

yea well spend some or ur money and buy a real rifle... ill sell ya mine for $1000... time to grow up and shoot a mans rifle ur still shootin the boys gun

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

zrexpilot, grow the hell up for **** sake.

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

only if you make him go to his room.

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

ok guys, lets stop the mudflinging and look at the facts. i discovered a pretty good site today when researching some projectile motion stuff for school. i honestly dont have time to state my case but check it out: [link]http://www.firearmstactical.com/wound.htm[/link]

its pretty good. alot of wound stuff that the military uses. should find it helpful in this debate.

slayer

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

ill go to my room when u start shootin a real gun and start bein a man and not a little girl and get rid of ur puddle jumper 243

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

and its energy not velocity that kills

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

I agree. A single torso shot from a 9mm handgun is many times survivable unless the heart ,BOTH lungs or a major artery is hit. The same shot from a .45 will not be so kind, and will put an exit wound the size of a fist out the other side carrying with it all that was in its path.

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

Ive seen some of that slayer. here another good link. http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/ballistics.htm

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

ok ZREX i have a question to ask u if it is velocity that kills not energy what would u rather take on a big game hunt ur .243 or a 308 or a 30-06 id like to see u shoot a 1000+lb bull with ur 243.....the thing will probly laugh at u...............I REST MY CASE ITS ENERGY NOT VELOCITY

RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
 

ya misewell shoot a buffalo with ur 243 too with its velocity and all