What magnification should I get?
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From:
I purchased a Winchester Model 70 7mm. Rem. Mag at the end of last deer season. Now is the time to fit it with some new optics. With this rifle I will primarily be hunting whitetails in 'cutover' and on powerlines that can reach up to about 500 yards. My question is what magnification should I get with my scope? Will a 44 or 50 be better for my field of view to see game farther away? I just realized I may have posted this in the wrong section so could someone move it for me.
#2
Welcome to the forums. 
I cannot think of a more appropriate place for this so don't worry.
Personally, I would probably go with the 44 mm objective and something like a 3-10 or 4-12 variable scope. The reasonably large objective coupled with the better than average magnification range should be ideal.

I cannot think of a more appropriate place for this so don't worry.
Personally, I would probably go with the 44 mm objective and something like a 3-10 or 4-12 variable scope. The reasonably large objective coupled with the better than average magnification range should be ideal.
#3
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From:
Thanks for the quick response. I want to get this scope in the near future so I have plenty of time to adjust it as well as shoot some different loads to see what I like before the season. I have a 3-9 which works well on my .30-.30, but I know I won't be scared to take a shot alot farther with my 7mm. Anyone else have some suggestions.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
From: MB.
MackRack, welcome to the board.
I have the 7mm Rem Mag and have installed a Leupold VX-II 3-9 x 50mm and think it’s a good match. You could go with higher power but I’m not sure if it’s really req’d. I like the field of view I get with my 50mm. I had a Leupold with the 40mm lens but didn’t like it as much as the 50mm. I also have the Simmons Aetec with the 44mm lens on my 308. That one also is pretty good but it won’t take place of my Leupold. Good luck.....
I have the 7mm Rem Mag and have installed a Leupold VX-II 3-9 x 50mm and think it’s a good match. You could go with higher power but I’m not sure if it’s really req’d. I like the field of view I get with my 50mm. I had a Leupold with the 40mm lens but didn’t like it as much as the 50mm. I also have the Simmons Aetec with the 44mm lens on my 308. That one also is pretty good but it won’t take place of my Leupold. Good luck.....
#7
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Lethbridge, AB
I believe the quality of the scope is as important as the power.
I also believe a 3-9 x42 is sufficient in any situation. Most hunting scopes
max out at 9 because you can still hold it steady without
a rest. Buy the best you can afford. my dream scope is the
KAHLES 1" AH3-9x42. The clearity and brightness in a high end scope
will surpass that of a low end with a 50mm objective.
Cheers
I also believe a 3-9 x42 is sufficient in any situation. Most hunting scopes
max out at 9 because you can still hold it steady without
a rest. Buy the best you can afford. my dream scope is the
KAHLES 1" AH3-9x42. The clearity and brightness in a high end scope
will surpass that of a low end with a 50mm objective.
Cheers
#8
I'd go with a good 2.5-10 power with at least a 40 mm objective,bigger and it will let more light in.The low power will be good in the bush and cranked to the max will be more then enough for the long shots
#9
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,667
Likes: 0
From: fort mcmurray alberta canada
42 mm is plenty big for an objective lens and it can be mounted lower than scopes with a larger objective.As far as magnification ,10 power is plenty for big game hunting out to 500 yards which is farther than most people are capable of shooting accurately..


