Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

White-Raven.., get your facts strait!
FACT- P&Y does have a velvet Catagory.
FACT- Minnesota Nontypical NETS 214. Its official right now!
FACT- This same deer IS the new WORLD RECORD VELVET NT ARCHERY!
FACT- Its been proven that people with more then two B&C deer are 99% of the time proven poachers! Watch what you brag about!
FACT- I can, and will back up all the above statements with FACTS!
FACT- You don't know diddly squat about measuring and record books.

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

P & Y DOES have a velvet category, but dont you have to remove the velvet for the measuring?? j/w

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

Nope. New a couple years ago. Full velvet catagory.

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

i agree that white ravin dosent know nutin he dosent check before he writes about things i knew there was a velvet catagoary but obviosly white ravin didnt he needs to think before he writes

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

WR, Is not a man,ok.

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

I don't have a P&Y book but according to their website while velvet enteries are allowed there is no seperate category for VELVET ONLY, they are annotated with an * to indicate it was a velvet entry. This has always been my understanding as well, if you can point us to where it states a seperate cat. for velvet animals I am sure many of us would appreciate it!!!

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

dc240nt, you know you really should at least try knowing what you're talking about. You're wrong about everything. first and foremost the deer only grossed 211 and netted 194 (which means it didn't even qualify for B&C). It's still a great buck though. I believe the deer scores 174 and change as a typical but Jim Kostroski chose to enter it into P&Y as a typical to reflect the highter, and I believe more representative, score. That is the official score. Here's a link to Jim's site so you can verify it for yourself http://www.magnumsportsx.com/Jim%20Kos%20Bio.htm As for your assertion that P&Y has a separate category for velvet, again you are incorrect. Skeeter has it right. they are merely included amongst the other entries where the score indicates and the fact that they are velvet is merely marked with an asterisk. Oh and as for your assertion that 99% of the time poachers take more than 2 B&C'ers I'd love to see where you dug up those figures. Don't you know that 57.4% of all statistics are made up on the spot? So anyway, that brings me to your 5th statement saying you'l be able to "back up all the above statements with FACTS!" Get back to us with these facts and don't forget to include your sources. I ask you now, who doesn't know what they're talking about?

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

play nice kids

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

Aren't personal attacks a violation of the forum rules?

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

If you can prove that above statement with facts I'll shave my legs and put on panty hose on a live web cam, for every one here to see.
Your coming across like a spoiled teenager.


One thing about WR like her or hate her. She knows how to score a buck.

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

Actually his post breaks a few rules. Kids today.lol

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

dc240nt and MinnesotaDeerHunter, I think you both should read the posting rules, especially these:

2. No threatening, abusive or harassing comments.

8. Do not engage in "flame-wars" or excessive exchange of confrontational postings. Debate is important, but users should not try to "pick a fight."

12. While we encourage lively debate, we will not tolerate personal attacks. Any person attacking another forum member, will receive a warning and have their message removed. Any future incident thereafter, will result in that member being removed from the forum.

RE: Reality Check Time... White-Raven!
 

Geez, even I know not to challenge her on a buck's score or record book facts.
Charlie P is right. She does know her stuff.

White-Raven
 

White-Raven,

I hope you can excuse the rudeness of the fawns (dc and MN d h). You know how fawns are. Anyhow, most of us here are a lot more respectful.

If you want to come over and join us on the "T.R.'s Tips" board here at Hunting.Net I'd like to have you join us. We can use good information, and (if my uderstanding is correct) more female input. And if you are female I can guarantee you I won't allow anyone to disrespect you on my board.

This is a personal invite from me.

God bless and good hunting,

T.R.

RE: White-Raven
 

DPV, That was me that said they would shave their legs on a web cam LMAO.

Still want to watch ?[&:]

I was sure he couldn't back his mouth up with facts on that one.

RE: White-Raven
 

Charlie P, take this for what it's worth but after hearing of your offer I kind of wish I was wrong....just this once. :)

RE: White-Raven
 

:D

RE: White-Raven
 

I would have to add the most important rule:

1AA> At no time engage in a debate that will result in CharlieP dreesing up in womens clothing and getting on cam. Please!!!

RE: White-Raven
 

:D:D

RE: White-Raven
 

Coffee in sinus hurts bad.

Hey when you know you can't loose bet it all, right?

RE: White-Raven
 

:D

RE: White-Raven
 

Mods if that is not a threat that results in banning I don't know what is!!!![X(] The mere thought of Charlie's legs shaven legs or not in pantyhose is enough to make a maggot puke!!![:o]

RE: White-Raven
 

Taz, LMAO