Reality Check Time..No Record!
12-17-2003 | 07:06 AM
#13
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,672
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg Virginia USA
RE: Reality Check Time..No Record!
Charlie P...2 non-typicals over 200....3 typicals over 170.....7 typicals over 140.
12-17-2003 | 07:12 AM
#14
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster pa
RE: Reality Check Time..No Record!
Well I have 5 over 200, 4 over 180, 3 over 170, 2 over 160, and a partrige in a pear tree. I would love to post picks but...uh..um.. oh yeah, my camera is ...um...broke. Yeah, that's it my camera is broke and every store within 500 miles is sold out
You guys do believe me though don't you.
You guys do believe me though don't you.
12-17-2003 | 07:16 AM
#15
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
RE: Reality Check Time..No Record!
WR, they don't score velvet deer in velvet. They peel it, and then score it. The buck gained "ZERO" inches by being in velvet. And as I posted before, the previous velvet record scored in at just over 196 inches. Pope and Young does not have a separate category for velvet records, but they do recognize them. When was the last time you shot a velvet buck? And I'd love it if you could post some pics of those bucks you got.
12-17-2003 | 07:36 AM
#16
Fork Horn
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
RE: Reality Check Time..No Record!
I've been reading alot of White Raven's postings lately, she seems to be very educated when it comes to scoring and knowledgable of record book animals. However, it seems that you hold alot of hostility and anger towards animals that people post that are dang nice bucks, and you question the legitimacy of all of them it seems. That's just what I have observed from your postings.
I'm not looking to get into an argument or anything, I'm not really knowledgable when it comes to scoring or record book animals, I'm simply stating what I've observed, that's all.
Also not trying to discredit you WR, but it is sooo easy to be someone we're not on the web......I'm also very impressed if you have in fact taken such animals as you've said, do you have photo's because we would all love to see them, that is some very impressive stats. for scores.
Sorry for my rambling.
I'm not looking to get into an argument or anything, I'm not really knowledgable when it comes to scoring or record book animals, I'm simply stating what I've observed, that's all.
Also not trying to discredit you WR, but it is sooo easy to be someone we're not on the web......I'm also very impressed if you have in fact taken such animals as you've said, do you have photo's because we would all love to see them, that is some very impressive stats. for scores.
Sorry for my rambling.
I wouldn't post em just out of principal.
12-17-2003 | 08:16 AM
#18
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba,Canada
RE: Reality Check Time..No Record!
Charlie P...2 non-typicals over 200....3 typicals over 170.....7 typicals over 140. And I've seen literally thousands of record book racks. Not while hunting though. Just through the course of my travels and meeting with people.