question for all members
11-24-2015, 09:45 AM
#81
Spike
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 32
Here, let me make it easy for you. I may not be perfect but I do my best.
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=20759
http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/big-...lk-2015-a.html
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum...now-track-buck
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...ighlight=moose
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=27058
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=22761
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=20759
http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/big-...lk-2015-a.html
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum...now-track-buck
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...ighlight=moose
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=27058
http://www.thehuntingbeast.com/viewt...?f=287&t=22761
Last edited by Exophysical; 11-24-2015 at 10:18 AM.
11-24-2015, 09:47 AM
#82
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 15,100
Yeah, we all know your ridiculous opinion by now which wouldn't be so bad if you didn't tell others that if they don't do it your way they have have less skills than you. I have been known to get into disputes with Ridge Runner, however, knowing where he lives and reading his posts for a couple of years, it is pretty obvious he has hunting skills, I suspect they are substantially better than yours and also suspect his shooting ability is better than yours, in fact I am pretty sure there are lots of folks here who have better than hunting skills than you do which makes your snobbish arrogance all the more hard to swallow.
Last edited by Oldtimr; 11-24-2015 at 09:53 AM.
11-24-2015, 09:58 AM
#83
Spike
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 32
Yeah, we all know your ridiculous opinion by now which wouldn't be so bad if you didn't tell others that if they don't do it your way they have have less skills than you. I have been known to get into disputes with Ridge Runner, however, knowing where he lives and reading his posts for a couple of years, it is pretty obvious he has hunting skills, I suspect they are substantially better than yours and also suspect his shooting ability is better than yours, in fact I am pretty sure there are lots of folks here who have better than hunting skills than you do which makes your snobbish arrogance all the more hard to swallow.
Last edited by Exophysical; 11-24-2015 at 10:04 AM.
11-24-2015, 10:24 AM
#84
Spike
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 40
"Listen ...Deleted by CalHunter...
Last edited by CalHunter; 11-24-2015 at 09:33 PM. Reason: Rules 2, 4, 8 & 12--7-Day Temp Ban.
11-24-2015, 10:49 AM
#85
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,081
"Deer do not live so you can wound them at 800 yards."
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
11-24-2015, 10:58 AM
#86
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,358
Some guys have the desire/skill, set up to hunt long range some guys at 10 yards with a bow, i can appreciate both. As a logger and hunter i find wasted deer in the woods from time to time and i check them out. Some are bad shots while some are good heart/lung shots lost to terrible tracking skills. To answer the OP's question on ethics, i think a good question we hunters should ask, is how many deer have you wounded/missed? It's easy to fondly remember that remarkable shot you made, but also easy to forget the deer you wounded or missed(maybe wounded?).
11-24-2015, 11:19 AM
#87
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
This is a very common occurrence in the profession, (every profession, in fact.)
1) Party 1 (usually a ranking officer or supervisor) *think* they have expertise, *think* they know something about something, and when they ask for an opinion they *think* they already know the answer;
2) Party 2 gives them a professional opinion;
3) Party 1 doesn't like what he hears, because he *thinks* he has expertise and knows something about something;
4) Party 1 (and his friends) get all haired up over what they hear and then start attacking Party 2;
5) Party 1 makes the call because he is the ranking officer or supervisor;
6) That decision results in horrible, FUBAR consequences, and the whole operation becomes a CF.
7) The unit ends up doing what Party 2 suggested in the first place, and that whole evolution is never spoken of again.
Yep! This seems VERY familiar...
Bronc
1) Party 1 (usually a ranking officer or supervisor) *think* they have expertise, *think* they know something about something, and when they ask for an opinion they *think* they already know the answer;
2) Party 2 gives them a professional opinion;
3) Party 1 doesn't like what he hears, because he *thinks* he has expertise and knows something about something;
4) Party 1 (and his friends) get all haired up over what they hear and then start attacking Party 2;
5) Party 1 makes the call because he is the ranking officer or supervisor;
6) That decision results in horrible, FUBAR consequences, and the whole operation becomes a CF.
7) The unit ends up doing what Party 2 suggested in the first place, and that whole evolution is never spoken of again.
Yep! This seems VERY familiar...
Bronc
11-24-2015, 11:58 AM
#88
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,359
"Deer do not live so you can wound them at 800 yards."
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
You might be a great hunter but that alone only makes you a better shooter.
Last edited by rockport; 11-24-2015 at 12:00 PM.
11-24-2015, 12:35 PM
#89
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
"Deer do not live so you can wound them at 800 yards."
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
If I poke a deer at 800 yards, that is my business. I disengage the sear, it falls over. If you are not capable of it, quit criticizing us who can. I have been hunting for over 50 years, and can track and jump bedded deer or whatever I am after. I was on a trap line when I was 5 years old and was hunting by myself at 10. Just because there are some that can connect 100% of the time at seriously long ranges doesn't make us a poor hunter. The skill and time invested makes us better hunters in my opinion. Come out to the prairies and hunt the stubble, and then judge, or better yet, stay in your little world and be happy.
11-24-2015, 02:31 PM
#90
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
907 yards...270 Wby, 150gr ABLR, Defiance action, Benchmark barrel, McMillan Hunter, Jewell trigger, Huskemaw scope, ONE SHOT...not a cent of taxpayer money spent on it.
I guess we aren't hunters tho, only shooters. I guess the other deer we got under 200 yards would mean we are hunters?
