What would the buck that dropped these have scored?
2 Attachment(s)
Just wondering. The main beams are both 29 inches.
|
just an estimation, but i'd say about 150-160 without deductions. maybe. Its hard to tell with pictures of sheds.
|
I'd guess 145ish with no brow on one side and no g4 on the other.
|
Id say about 135
|
No brow tines and 6 inch long times. I would say 130 gross tops.
|
My biggest rack was a 130 class rack, that one looks bigger.
Measure it up... Tho you'll have to guess on the spread, this should put you in the ballpark. http://www.boone-crockett.org/bgReco...Whitetail+Deer |
Originally Posted by rockport
(Post 4089146)
I'd guess 145ish with no brow on one side and no g4 on the other.
That dog couldn't care less! :s2: |
Yup the missing brow and g4will hurt.if you go to the boone and crocket web site it shows you how to score a rack.its really not that hard,then you will know how for future referance.its alot easier to score a buck with hands on experiance than it is from looking at a picture.
|
I agree, 135 sounds about right.
|
I think low 40s
|
I'd guesstimate him at 136 net.
|
Good guesses! I ended up scoring him @ around 141. It's a massive rack. I ended up putting the sheds on a fake skull from Gander Mountain.
|
Yep, I was going to say 140-150. The lack of a brow and tine really drag the score down like the others said. Big pair though regardless!
|
Originally Posted by bristowboy_20
(Post 4113711)
Good guesses! I ended up scoring him @ around 141. It's a massive rack. I ended up putting the sheds on a fake skull from Gander Mountain.
|
Originally Posted by NebBuckHunter
(Post 4113769)
Yep, I was going to say 140-150. The lack of a brow and tine really drag the score down like the others said. Big pair though regardless!
|
Originally Posted by Oneofthesedays
(Post 4089175)
No brow tines and 6 inch long times. I would say 130 gross tops.
I'll just re-score it and take a new picture of it compared to one of the biggest bucks I have ever shot. :D |
4 Attachment(s)
OK done.
The smaller rack scored in at 130 and change gross. That is one of the biggest bucks I have personally shot. I added it to the picture to compare with the other one. The big one came in at 145 2/8 with deductions. Overall score was 162 7/8. FOUR of the tines are broken and I did not guesstimate for the broken pieces. That broken brow tine still had a little over an inch left of it so I counted that as a point. All in all it's not a bad deer. I took it to an official P&Y scoring buddy of mine (The Founder of Bowhunting Magazine) just to look at and he said "That's the kind everybody's after". :D I put some new pics in this reply too. |
He'd of scored a place on my wall!
|
Originally Posted by bristowboy_20
(Post 4114049)
OK done.
The smaller rack scored in at 130 and change gross. That is one of the biggest bucks I have personally shot. I added it to the picture to compare with the other one. The big one came in at 145 2/8 with deductions. Overall score was 162 7/8. FOUR of the tines are broken and I did not guesstimate for the broken pieces. That broken brow tine still had a little over an inch left of it so I counted that as a point. All in all it's not a bad deer. I took it to an official P&Y scoring buddy of mine (The Founder of Bowhunting Magazine) just to look at and he said "That's the kind everybody's after". :D I put some new pics in this reply too. |
Yea with 29 inch main beams alone there is no way that deer would only gross in the 130s or low 140s cause he has good mass also. I would have guessed him in the mid to upper 160s gross. I have a buck on my wall that has a little over 29 inch main beams and I am here to tell you those are really long main beams. He scored 192 and change
|
I must really be miss judging because I just don't see 163 inches there.
|
Originally Posted by rockport
(Post 4114153)
I must really be miss judging because I just don't see 163 inches there.
From the picture alone I don't either and that's why I'm not going to make guesses on pictures any more since this one was actually scored! |
2 Attachment(s)
Seriously you guys don't see it? I even missed a circumference measurement that would have added 3 more inches. In one of these pics I have a G2 pressed against my shirt. I don't know what else to do lol.
|
Definitely looks bigger in those pictures than the OP.
29 inch main beams is a pretty big deal. I would still never guess almost 29 inches on that left side. The main beams is where I'm off. I would have guessed about 25 on the right and 22 on the left......which is about a 12 inch difference. |
missing brow tine on the right beam, no G4 on the left, hafta score it as a 3x3, I say 124
RR |
Originally Posted by rockport
(Post 4114258)
Definitely looks bigger in those pictures than the OP.
29 inch main beams is a pretty big deal. I would still never guess almost 29 inches on that left side. The main beams is where I'm off. I would have guessed about 25 on the right and 22 on the left......which is about a 12 inch difference. RR- 3x3? :P It's a 6x4 and I'm not even counting the broken brow. There are 2 stickers that are both at least 1 2/8 on the right base but all that does is hurt the score a little bit. I guess you could call it a 4x4 if you wanted, but not a 3x3. Love this forum lol. :biggrin: |
Originally Posted by bristowboy_20
(Post 4114326)
I'll just make a video of me measuring them someday soon. It's really no big deal. But yes, 29 inches is no joke. 29 2/8 and 28 6/8. I used a cable and carefully ran the length of the beams from base to tip and then measured it on a measuring tape. Even used pencil! lol.
RR- 3x3? :P It's a 6x4 and I'm not even counting the broken brow. There are 2 stickers that are both at least 1 2/8 on the right base but all that does is hurt the score a little bit. I guess you could call it a 4x4 if you wanted, but not a 3x3. Love this forum lol. :biggrin: |
Originally Posted by bristowboy_20
(Post 4114326)
I'll just make a video of me measuring them someday soon. It's really no big deal. But yes, 29 inches is no joke. 29 2/8 and 28 6/8. I used a cable and carefully ran the length of the beams from base to tip and then measured it on a measuring tape. Even used pencil! lol.
RR- 3x3? :P It's a 6x4 and I'm not even counting the broken brow. There are 2 stickers that are both at least 1 2/8 on the right base but all that does is hurt the score a little bit. I guess you could call it a 4x4 if you wanted, but not a 3x3. Love this forum lol. :biggrin: I said the main beams is where I'M off. Its just shows how easy it is to be way off scoring a picture. |
In those last pictures it sure looks pretty big to me. I can't imagine it missing P&Y with those beams and mass.
|
I can see where it would reach the 150-160 Range....gonna mean a lot more to You if You happen to shot it the following Deer Season and have the previous Sheds! ;)
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rockport
(Post 4114368)
I'm not calling you a liar. You don't have to prove anything to me.
I said the main beams is where I'M off. Its just shows how easy it is to be way off scoring a picture. |
Originally Posted by bristowboy_20
(Post 4115130)
Sometimes it's tough to judge a picture. Look at this photo of Tim Beck's 305 inch giant. Its main beams are 29 6/8 and 30 4/8! It doesn't look that big by this photo at all, at least that's my opinion. I have seen other pictures of it though that made me a believer lol.
My buck this year (in the picture to the left) had 25 inch main beams and scored 168 5/8 |
Originally Posted by rockport
(Post 4115135)
Yeah I wouldn't have guessed those main beams that long either.
My buck this year (in the picture to the left) had 25 inch main beams and scored 168 5/8 |
i got two 160s ive killed and that deer is rite there with em from what i can tell
|
I would say they score about 150ish before deductions
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.