![]() |
130s 3yr old.
|
he may net 140, G3 is weak on the left side, G4 is weak on the right so he'll lose a lot there
RR |
155.. 4 year old I would say...
|
He's well over 140. I agree with katerlax. 150s somewhere. Hard to age from those pics, but 4 seems reasonable to me.
|
150ish and 4 year old
|
Originally Posted by kateraxl2381
(Post 4081674)
155.. 4 year old I would say...
|
Originally Posted by HatchieLuvr
(Post 4081915)
Ever killed any 150s? He's a nice deer but a LONG way from 155 and look at his thin neck, "long gangly legs" and no thick chest or brisket like a 150s 4yr old would more than likely have!
|
I couldn't access the video, and those aren't great pictures, but I would stick with 150ish. He looks very similar to a 138" 8 ptr I shot a couple years ago and being a 10 ptr I am assuming he's got an extra 10 inches there. I also didn't look at where the deer is from. My buddy has shot some Mississippi and Oklahoma bucks that look ginormous because their bodies were so small. Deer in the northern part of the country and canada like they have a lot smaller racks than they actually do. A 125 lb 150 incher looks a lot different than a 200 lb 150 incher
|
Originally Posted by North22
(Post 4081936)
I couldn't access the video, and those aren't great pictures, but I would stick with 150ish. He looks very similar to a 138" 8 ptr I shot a couple years ago and being a 10 ptr I am assuming he's got an extra 10 inches there. I also didn't look at where the deer is from. My buddy has shot some Mississippi and Oklahoma bucks that look ginormous because their bodies were so small. Deer in the northern part of the country and canada like they have a lot smaller racks than they actually do. A 125 lb 150 incher looks a lot different than a 200 lb 150 incher
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.