browning x bolt setup advice<<<
#1
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
well hey yall im new to the forum here and am wanting a new rifle for this deer season ive narrowed it down to a bolt action rifle. ( all i have right now is lever action and semi auto besides my bolt action .17 ) so anyways i did a lot of research and im pretty set on the browning x bolt.
now my question to yall is what caliber to get. im pretty set on the 7 rem mag myself but if yall think something would be a better choice then let me know. recoil dont bother me when im in the woods so thats not to big of a factor.
next is the scope. ive been having my eye on the nikon buckmaster with the BDC radicals. would this scope be a good choice? also what size should i get it in? im thinking a 3x9x40 may not zoom in enough for 200-400 yard shots...i would just like advice on this setup. im wanting a big game do everything gun that wont have a problem dropping a deer at 200 yards or at 400 yards..
thanks guys!
now my question to yall is what caliber to get. im pretty set on the 7 rem mag myself but if yall think something would be a better choice then let me know. recoil dont bother me when im in the woods so thats not to big of a factor.
next is the scope. ive been having my eye on the nikon buckmaster with the BDC radicals. would this scope be a good choice? also what size should i get it in? im thinking a 3x9x40 may not zoom in enough for 200-400 yard shots...i would just like advice on this setup. im wanting a big game do everything gun that wont have a problem dropping a deer at 200 yards or at 400 yards..

thanks guys!
#2
The X-Bolt is a great choice if that is what you want and like. I had one in 270 Winchester but decided to sell it. It was accurate and was not real picky with bullet weights either.
The 7mm Rem Mag is a great choice but the standard 270, 280, 308, 30-06, etc will do just as well for many hunters.
I used a Nikon Monarch UCC(a line above the Buckmaster) and it worked well. Very clear and bright view. I prefer Leupold and Zeiss scopes on my hunting rifles.
The 7mm Rem Mag is a great choice but the standard 270, 280, 308, 30-06, etc will do just as well for many hunters.
I used a Nikon Monarch UCC(a line above the Buckmaster) and it worked well. Very clear and bright view. I prefer Leupold and Zeiss scopes on my hunting rifles.
#3
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
thanks va huntr one of the main reasons i wanted to go with the 7mag is because its not a standard round..i like using something that not many others use.. like my 45-70 marlin haha.. and i think the .270 is just about the same size as the 7 mag.
and the nikon was a good scope for you? i was going to go with a leupold but i really like the BDC that nikon has. im not use to far shots and i think it could help a lot.. ive never had an expensive scope so i kinda wanna buy the best for the money. thanks..
also what finsh would you recommend on the x bolt? which did you have and did it hold up good to normal use?
and the nikon was a good scope for you? i was going to go with a leupold but i really like the BDC that nikon has. im not use to far shots and i think it could help a lot.. ive never had an expensive scope so i kinda wanna buy the best for the money. thanks..
also what finsh would you recommend on the x bolt? which did you have and did it hold up good to normal use?
#4
Good gun choice. I would get stainless with a composite stock.
7mm is a very popular round I don't know where you got your info from about it not being common. Me I prefer a 280 which is just a necked down 7mm. Without all the recoil and has way better trajectory than a 270. But the 280 does not have many options in factory ammo.
I like your 7 mag idea maybe a 7mmwsm.
I also prefer Leopold optics they have the BBC ethical like Nikon. Either optic is good it's just a ford vs Chevy deal. Just do not cheap out if you are planning on 200+yds shots. Every scope I have is 3x9x40 and I am good to 350. I have never tried past that.
7mm is a very popular round I don't know where you got your info from about it not being common. Me I prefer a 280 which is just a necked down 7mm. Without all the recoil and has way better trajectory than a 270. But the 280 does not have many options in factory ammo.
I like your 7 mag idea maybe a 7mmwsm.
I also prefer Leopold optics they have the BBC ethical like Nikon. Either optic is good it's just a ford vs Chevy deal. Just do not cheap out if you are planning on 200+yds shots. Every scope I have is 3x9x40 and I am good to 350. I have never tried past that.
#5
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Good gun choice. I would get stainless with a composite stock.
7mm is a very popular round I don't know where you got your info from about it not being common. Me I prefer a 280 which is just a necked down 7mm. Without all the recoil and has way better trajectory than a 270. But the 280 does not have many options in factory ammo.
I like your 7 mag idea maybe a 7mmwsm.
I also prefer Leopold optics they have the BBC ethical like Nikon. Either optic is good it's just a ford vs Chevy deal. Just do not cheap out if you are planning on 200+yds shots. Every scope I have is 3x9x40 and I am good to 350. I have never tried past that.
7mm is a very popular round I don't know where you got your info from about it not being common. Me I prefer a 280 which is just a necked down 7mm. Without all the recoil and has way better trajectory than a 270. But the 280 does not have many options in factory ammo.
I like your 7 mag idea maybe a 7mmwsm.
I also prefer Leopold optics they have the BBC ethical like Nikon. Either optic is good it's just a ford vs Chevy deal. Just do not cheap out if you are planning on 200+yds shots. Every scope I have is 3x9x40 and I am good to 350. I have never tried past that.
the 7mm rem mag or the 7mm WSM
i notice the the barrel for the 7mm rem mag is 26' and the WSM is 22'
and good to know that the 3x9 is fine at those distances. thanks!
#6
thanks va huntr one of the main reasons i wanted to go with the 7mag is because its not a standard round..i like using something that not many others use.. like my 45-70 marlin haha.. and i think the .270 is just about the same size as the 7 mag.
and the nikon was a good scope for you? i was going to go with a leupold but i really like the BDC that nikon has. im not use to far shots and i think it could help a lot.. ive never had an expensive scope so i kinda wanna buy the best for the money. thanks..
also what finsh would you recommend on the x bolt? which did you have and did it hold up good to normal use?
and the nikon was a good scope for you? i was going to go with a leupold but i really like the BDC that nikon has. im not use to far shots and i think it could help a lot.. ive never had an expensive scope so i kinda wanna buy the best for the money. thanks..
also what finsh would you recommend on the x bolt? which did you have and did it hold up good to normal use?
I had the "Hunter" model, which consisted of a matte blue finish and a satin wood stock. I personally do not like the feel of the X-Bolt's with the synthetic stock. The Nikon was a very good scope, its just I prefer the Leupold and Zeiss scopes I have.
If you want a 7mm, I'd go with the 7mm Rem Mag as the ammunition will be as easy to locate as a 30-06 or 270 Winchester.
#7
Proud owner of a X-bolt stainless stalker in .338 WM.
Not only do I think the stainless barrel is worth the extra money, but I also feel a scope of equal "value" to the gun is worth the additional money.
BTW - I also own a Sako A7 stainless in 7MM RM................great caliber !
Not only do I think the stainless barrel is worth the extra money, but I also feel a scope of equal "value" to the gun is worth the additional money.
BTW - I also own a Sako A7 stainless in 7MM RM................great caliber !
#8
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Proud owner of a X-bolt stainless stalker in .338 WM.
Not only do I think the stainless barrel is worth the extra money, but I also feel a scope of equal "value" to the gun is worth the additional money.
BTW - I also own a Sako A7 stainless in 7MM RM................great caliber !
Not only do I think the stainless barrel is worth the extra money, but I also feel a scope of equal "value" to the gun is worth the additional money.
BTW - I also own a Sako A7 stainless in 7MM RM................great caliber !
#9
is the stainless model worth the extra cash? its about a 250$ difference. and when i say uncommon just not many of my friends have one around here which i like. and what 7mag should i go with ?
the 7mm rem mag or the 7mm WSM
i notice the the barrel for the 7mm rem mag is 26' and the WSM is 22'
and good to know that the 3x9 is fine at those distances. thanks!
the 7mm rem mag or the 7mm WSM
i notice the the barrel for the 7mm rem mag is 26' and the WSM is 22'
and good to know that the 3x9 is fine at those distances. thanks!
Yes stainless and composite stock is a weapon for life. No worry of weather condition.
For long range go with the longer barrel. I do not believe there is a trajectory difference between 7mm mag. And 7mm wsm .


