GVoverstreet7

I've been talking with my buddies lately and a main discussion topic when watching hunting shows is what would you prefer (if you could choose) a giant almost symetrical typical or a Big mangled Non-Typical, with points all over. Personally I love the look of a classical giant typical 12 pointer, just the natural look is almost breathe taking. But my buddies all prefer a non-typical that is just crazy to look at sometimes. I was wondering what everyone else thought about this topic, and what you would decide?

halfbakedi420

the big ugly is nice, but symmetrical is kewl as well...comparin apples to oranges i think...both are cool

halfbakedi420

i would like to hang a cactus buck on my wall..that'd be kewl, not many have those!!

BarnesX.308

Typical. Unless it's a nice looking non-typical with some semblence of symmetry. Some of those NTs are ugly.

A typical 5X5 or 6X6 with split brows, forked G2s and a kicker or two would be ideal.

appleater25

non-typical. the rarest of an already rare category of huge bucks!

chevymanar

Typical for me.

1shotkill1993

I prefer the look of typical bucks myself...not to say I wouldn't hang a non-typical

Champlain Islander

typical for me

GVoverstreet7

Yeah I mean I wouldn't turn down a big non-typical either

SWThomas

Definitely non-typ.