+1

Why are so many people obsessed with the score of a deer's rack? Is this a flippin' video game? Anyone with 2oz of sense would say that that is an awesome deer. To quantify it to a composite of the measurements degrades what it is, which is a very impressive example of nature's (read God's) glory. The sad part is that there are idiots out there that would call this guy a "cull buck" because he's 3 1/2 years old and doesn't score 220+ and just won't ever get there. To me, it's sad, really. But I get "can't breathe" excited over a deer like the big bodied 4 pointer I shot a couple weeks ago... I have almost 60 lbs of Landjaegers and summer sausage from that guy... and as my 4 year old daughter likes to say, it's delicious! Maybe I'm in it for the wrong reasons... no, I don't think so.

Mike

S H O O T >..........Worry about the score later!

You won't have a snowballs chance at that one. He didn't get big because he's stupid.

The beams are kinda jacked up. The end just after the G6. Great buck I just know he would have a special place on my wall!

Shoot him and find out.

I think you might want to give him another five yrs because he's got a lot of potential. haha.

a inch away from huge and several inches above awsome!!lol big deer good luck at getten him!

sweet rack lots of character genes are no good though let him have it. then take the tape to him

He's got a "sweet rack" but his "genes are no good", my a$$. Please explain how a deer with a great big rack has bad genes. I thought that big racks = good genes. So how can you tell by looking at a picture that this deer somehow has bad genes? And what constitutes "good genes?"

This is the problem with the whole Quality Deer Management movement. It's basically turned a bunch of rank amateurs into self styled wildlife geneticists that got their qualifications watching canned hunts on the Outdoor Channel. :rant:

Mike

That right there is FUNNY, I don't care who you are!:s2::s2::s2: