Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

Check out the Bowhunting forum on hunting.net. Follow the link for the details. http://forum.hunting.net/asppg/tm.as...mode=1&smode=1

RE: Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz......................ZZZZZZZZZZZ Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Still sounds like antler envy.

RE: Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

quote]ORIGINAL: timbercruiser

ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz......................ZZZZZZZZZZZ Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Still sounds like antler envy.
[/quote]
Ding...ding...ding. We have a winner. Timbercruiser hit the nail square on the head. I don' t know about you guys, but wouldn' t it be nice to have nothing better to do than b**ch and moan about something as insignificant as a deer' s rack, taken by another hunter at that! Seriously WR, you rally need to sit back, have a Coke, and a smile. IN OTHER WORDS: Give it a freakin' break.

It has become painfully obvious that Whie Raven is suffering from an extreme case of antler envy (as diagnosed by TC). We are all aware of your undying quest to run this Zaft buck topic into the ground. Final rulings have been made, it is not a new world record, let' s just leave it for history to sort out and get on with life.

RE: Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

When the hunter actually deserves the recognition I have no problem with them. I know Milo quite well and have met him on a variety of occasions as well as Mike Beatty and a lot of other people who have shot exceptional animals. It' s not the antlers I have a problem with. It' s Zaft, the " man on the move."

RE: Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

SV has the rack been officially dismissed as an illegal entry into Pope and Young, Buckmaster or other record books? I checked all the links that Whine Raven has posted and thus far nothing I have seen from an official source stated that. The link he had said they stopped selling the replicas advertised as record, but no reason was given for stopping that I saw.

RE: Zaft Replicas Considered Illegal
 

Timbercruiser, the Zaft buck was not ruled ineligible for P&Y entry. Unfortunately.

[Deleted]
 

[Deleted by Admins]