RaghornHS

Now I'm just a guy from the Northwoods of Wisconsin, but don't you think the tomahawk would have some blood on it? Seems a bit far-fetched for me.

patchholder

exactly the bullet hole under the tomahawk in first picture, and then the skinned out picture with half the pictured cropped out on the right side!

crokit

"Hawk wound sure looks like post-mortem.

Robert L E

A) It seems pretty bloodless, there should have been blood everywhere from a hole like that. There isn't even blood on the tomahawk.

B) If a deer can jump an arrow at 200+ fps at 30 yards shot by a stationary hunter, I imagine that a deer could run 20 yards in the time that a hand tossed tomahawk could fly 50. Keep in mind that the deer would be running before the tomahawk left his hand due to all of the body movement involved.

C) I can smell the BS from here.

ken3g

I've played a lot of baseball and it take one very strong arm to through a tomhawk that far and still have penetration power at that distance. And wound looked a little far back IMO to bring her down. I didn't find tomhawks in PA regulations book, only bow and crossbow killed in special archery season in WMUs 5C, 2B, and 5D.

superstrutter

I think he's full of it. He says the hole is where the bottom of the blade came through. There is no way that happened. Look at the blade in the deer. The bottom part of the bladeis nowhere near that mysterious hole. How can that be legal anyway? I guess slingshots will be next.

Crow31

BS

rage2blade

It is BS. Trust me that 3rd pic is an entrance hole from a rage 2 blade broadhead!!

bowmanaj

No blood on the tomahawk... Bullet hole... "fifty yard thrust".....Give me a break

coyote170

What Rory said!