RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

sounds like you could be doing alot of shooting (which is always a good thing!)so as jag said if for one reason go for the .270 for ammo price my 7mm ammo gets expensive quick.

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

Thanks for the input folks!

To reply to one of the previous post, I've always wanted a .280, but finding one in a left handed stainless/synthetic model is pretty hard unless I have it custom built.

I guessI could always get a .270 or 06' and have it rebarreled one day to a .280.....hmmmm.....

Any other opinions would be greatly appreciated.

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

I'd go .280. although there is nothing wrong with 270. I like the older stuff my self........ 6.5x55mm, 7x 57, 257 roberts and so on

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

The dead deer or hog won't know the difference, and I doubt you would.

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

I have a 270 and a 7mm saum. It's pretty much the same as a 7mmr. On deer at leasts I have'nt seen any appreciable difference on deer between it and my 270. Plus the 270 is cheaper to shoot.

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

im pretty bias top .35 calibers. i say .350 mag to everyting lol 180 gr barnes x. the way i see it, theres no debate about that caliber on anything. bang. flop. dead.

RE: .270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
 

I've been shooting the 7mm mag. since 1977. For hogs or bear I'd justswitch from 140gr. to 175gr.