![]() |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
Hope hes happy. Probally a tax deduction though.
|
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world). |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
IMO, if you spend that much to kill 4 deer, no matter the time situation, or lack of it, you're an idiot. I am sure you can findsome place, guided with all the extras for a quarter of that. But, since I can't even affod that 50,000 for 4 deer, I guess I don't know for sure.
|
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
Like some of you other guys.... I'd buy some land and manage it for some nice deer.
|
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman My Dad pass along a story to my son and I last night about a local lawyer that took his son and a hired hand to somewhere in the midwest (Iowa or Illinois?) to shoot (NOT HUNT) 3 bucks. The lawyer killed a 300+" buck, his son killed a 200+" buck, and his hired hand killed a 190+" buck at a cost of OVER $200,000. This all the info that was passed on to me, but I am curious if they took the halters off the deer before or after the shots. |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: PABuck_HNTR Like some of you other guys.... I'd buy some land and manage it for some nice deer. |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: Kybuckhunter Its not for me but the guys has the money then good for him. He earned it so he should spend it how he wants. I hate these shooting preserves but I dont want to see the government telling me how I can spend my money. If there are people dumb enough to spend the money then I say go for it and die happy.... |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+". This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world). |
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: sjsfire ORIGINAL: retrieverman I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+". This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world). I wouldn't kill a released pen deer, or a deer on a "reserve" but more power to a guy who wants to do it. His dollars and vote are on the same side of the issues that mine are... and that is what counts. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.