Ban Jimmy Houston
02-03-2006, 01:44 PM
#31
Typical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 866
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: NY Bowhunter
I'm having a really hard time understanding how any hunter is justifying/defending Jimmy Houston and that video footage.
I'm having a really hard time understanding how any hunter is justifying/defending Jimmy Houston and that video footage.
Or in the case of a few they are just stooges of a rock 'n roll Moe.
02-03-2006, 01:52 PM
#32
Typical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 866
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: kevin1
Actually , I used Nugent as an example because unlike Houston he doesn't hide the fact that he supports high fence killing . I don't like it regardless of which one , but it's entirely possible that Houston may not have known that he was breaking the law . Ignorance of it is no excuse , but I found it strange that Ronny Dunn made that claim as well at the trial . Allegedly he was told by Bellar that since Bellar owned the deer in question that they could kill them anytime and in any way they wanted without a license or prescribed weapon . I don't know if I believe that , but reasonable doubt at the time of trial is what our justice system goes by .
ORIGINAL: Charlie P
Kevin, Nugent does it? That the same as when people say "look what Clinton did" when they know what the person they are talking about did is wrong.
Kevin, Nugent does it? That the same as when people say "look what Clinton did" when they know what the person they are talking about did is wrong.
Now for the right or wrong, he knew he was in a cage. It was so small the camera man was right on top of the fence so he could get a shot of Jimmy in the middle. He knew he was baiting and he knew all of Bellar's hired hands were chasing the deer back and forth in front of him to shoot it. He knew it was so spooked from being chased he couldn't even come close to making one of those video"stops" with his idiotic attempt at a phony bleet and even thought it was pretty funny to watch it bouncing off the fence on each side of the cage.
He is a scummy piece of trash.
02-03-2006, 02:17 PM
#33
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 25
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
he has the right to hunt the way he wants. What did he do he killed a deer you do no different quit your complaining allready. And I realy dont care if he does it again I dont let people bother me i hunt all public land so dont try to acuse me of hunting the way he does either.
02-03-2006, 02:49 PM
#34
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,000
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: waynejohnson
he has the right to hunt the way he wants. What did he do he killed a deer you do no different quit your complaining allready. And I realy dont care if he does it again I dont let people bother me i hunt all public land so dont try to acuse me of hunting the way he does either.
he has the right to hunt the way he wants. What did he do he killed a deer you do no different quit your complaining allready. And I realy dont care if he does it again I dont let people bother me i hunt all public land so dont try to acuse me of hunting the way he does either.
NYBOW, the email reply you got is for real. One of the members of our Indiana hunting site personally got a call from Houston after he emailed his site and said he would never buy a thing with his name on it again.
02-03-2006, 03:04 PM
#35
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: Jack Ryan
You can THINK what ever you want but you better KNOW the law if you want to really B good.
ORIGINAL: johnnyBgood
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
Who the hell would drug an animal in a small 3 acre inclosure to make it easier to kill?That sounds way to far fetched to believe.Unless it was a hormone drug to increase antler growth and then I don't think that would be against the law cause they give cows steroids and it is legal to do.
02-03-2006, 03:42 PM
#36
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pineview GF. USA
Posts: 374
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: johnnyBgood
I now if I owned 20 acre and it was caged and I bought and stocked animals in that caged area.Them are mine to do what I want with them.Be it sell them or hunt them, they are mine and no liscense is required to anyone I give permission to hunt them any time of the year because I have paid for them.They are domestic animals once they are bought and caged. i don't understand the drugged part though?Was the animal drugged or was Jimmy on drugs?Who the hell would drug an animal in a small 3 acre inclosure to make it easier to kill?That sounds way to far fetched to believe.Unless it was a hormone drug to increase antler growth and then I don't think that would be against the law cause they give cows steroids and it is legal to do.
ORIGINAL: Jack Ryan
You can THINK what ever you want but you better KNOW the law if you want to really B good.
ORIGINAL: johnnyBgood
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
Who the hell would drug an animal in a small 3 acre inclosure to make it easier to kill?That sounds way to far fetched to believe.Unless it was a hormone drug to increase antler growth and then I don't think that would be against the law cause they give cows steroids and it is legal to do.
02-03-2006, 05:04 PM
#37
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,688
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
Holy smokes!! I just got off the phone with the man himself. He actually called me. He said that I am the first person he has called about this who has talked to him. Anyways, he says the video was altered by someone. That the enclosure was 1200 acres in size, not3-6.That he could see fence on one side, but nowhere else. And that his video he has of it looks nothing like that. He also said that the meat was tested for drugs, and none were found.
02-03-2006, 07:41 PM
#38
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 379
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
Well THAT's COOL!! At least he has an explanation...I hope it's true...guess time will tell.
On this matter, I do think it's disgusting and just seems stupid. I sure wouldn't want to kill a deer under those circumstances.
On the other hand,I DO think a man that OWNS his land, and OWNS his livestock, ought to be able to do with it what he wants, REGARDLESS of what I, or anyone else THINK is "ethical" or "right". I'd rather see guys doing that crap on their PRIVATE land, than see gun drives on the land I hunt. What someone does on THEIR land doesn't affect my hunting or anyone elses, so I'm not going to sweat it.
On this matter, I do think it's disgusting and just seems stupid. I sure wouldn't want to kill a deer under those circumstances.
On the other hand,I DO think a man that OWNS his land, and OWNS his livestock, ought to be able to do with it what he wants, REGARDLESS of what I, or anyone else THINK is "ethical" or "right". I'd rather see guys doing that crap on their PRIVATE land, than see gun drives on the land I hunt.
What someone does on THEIR land doesn't affect my hunting or anyone elses, so I'm not going to sweat it.
02-03-2006, 07:52 PM
#39
Typical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 866
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: johnnyBgood
I now if I owned 20 acre and it was caged and I bought and stocked animals in that caged area.Them are mine to do what I want with them.Be it sell them or hunt them, they are mine and no liscense is required to anyone I give permission to hunt them any time of the year because I have paid for them.They are domestic animals once they are bought and caged. i don't understand the drugged part though?Was the animal drugged or was Jimmy on drugs?Who the hell would drug an animal in a small 3 acre inclosure to make it easier to kill?That sounds way to far fetched to believe.Unless it was a hormone drug to increase antler growth and then I don't think that would be against the law cause they give cows steroids and it is legal to do.
ORIGINAL: Jack Ryan
You can THINK what ever you want but you better KNOW the law if you want to really B good.
ORIGINAL: johnnyBgood
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
It's not legal to shoot your chickens or cows?Who said this?If it was their animals,I do not see how and why it would be illegal to kill them even without a liscense. You don't need liscense to hunt a canned hunt.You pay the owner for the animal you want to shoot and that is it.The only way I think this would be illegal if they didn't own the deerthat wasshot.Then it would of ment Jimmy was not at fault for it,because he thought they owned the deer that he paid to shoot.
Who the hell would drug an animal in a small 3 acre inclosure to make it easier to kill?That sounds way to far fetched to believe.Unless it was a hormone drug to increase antler growth and then I don't think that would be against the law cause they give cows steroids and it is legal to do.
I can't help it if people have their head somewhere that makes them incapable of believing what they see.
02-03-2006, 07:57 PM
#40
Typical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 866
RE: Ban Jimmy Houston
ORIGINAL: longrifle1000
Holy smokes!! I just got off the phone with the man himself. He actually called me. He said that I am the first person he has called about this who has talked to him. Anyways, he says the video was altered by someone. That the enclosure was 1200 acres in size, not3-6.That he could see fence on one side, but nowhere else. And that his video he has of it looks nothing like that. He also said that the meat was tested for drugs, and none were found.
Holy smokes!! I just got off the phone with the man himself. He actually called me. He said that I am the first person he has called about this who has talked to him. Anyways, he says the video was altered by someone. That the enclosure was 1200 acres in size, not3-6.That he could see fence on one side, but nowhere else. And that his video he has of it looks nothing like that. He also said that the meat was tested for drugs, and none were found.
