|
Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
Also available online at: http://www.w4wc.org
2002 Hunter's Heritage Council Political Action Committee Ballot Recommendations Legislative Candidates by District 1st Legislative District House Seat 1: Joshua Freed (R) House Seat 2: Leo Van Hollebeke (R) 2nd Legislative District House Seat 1: Roger Bush (R) House Seat 2: Thomas Campbell (R) 3rd Legislative District House Seat 1: Jeffrey Knox (R) House Seat 2: Ryan Leonard (R) 4th Legislative District House Seat 1: Larry Crouse (R) House Seat 2: Lynn Schindler (R) 5th Legislative District House Seat 1: Cheryl Pflug (R) House Seat 2: Edwin Glenn Anderson (R) 6th Legislative District House Seat 1: Bradley Benson (R) House Seat 2: John Ahern (R) Senate Seat: James West (R) 7th Legislative District House Seat 1: Robert Sump (R) House Seat 2: Cathy McMorris (R) Senate Seat: Bob Morton (R) 8th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: Jerome Delvin (R) Senate Seat: Patricia Hale (R) 9th Legislative District House Seat 1: Donald Cox (R) House Seat 2: Mark Schoesler (R) 10th Legislative District House Seat 1: Barry Sehlin (R) House Seat 2: Barbara Bailey (R) 11th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation 12th Legislative District House Seat 1: Cary Condotta (R) House Seat 2: Armstrong Michael D (R) 13th Legislative District House Step 1: Janea Holmquist (R) House Step 2: William Hinkle (R) Senate Seat: Joyce Mulliken (R) 14th Legislative District House Seat 1: Mary Skinner (R) House Seat 2: James Clements (R) 15th Legislative District House Seat 1: Bruce Chandler (R) House Seat 2: Daniel Newhouse (R) Senate Seat: James Honeyford (R) 16th Legislative District House Seat 1: David Mastin (R) House Seat 2: William “Bill” Grant (D) 17th Legislative District House Seat 1: Marcus Boldt (R) House Seat 2: James Dunn (R) 18th Legislative District House Seat 1: Thomas Mielke (R) House Seat 2: Ed Orcutt (R) 19th Legislative District House Seat 1: Brian Hatfield (D) House Seat 2: Mark Doumit (D) 20th Legislative District House Seat 1: Richard DeBolt (R) House Seat 2: Gary Alexander (R) 21st Legislative District House Seat 1: Jeffrey Thorp (R) House Seat 2: No Recommendation Senate Seat: Paull Shin (D) 22nd Legislative District House Seat 1: Mark Daniels (R) House Seat 2: John Olson (R) 23rd Legislative District House Seat 1: Donald Large (R) House Seat 2: Beverly Woods (R) 24th Legislative District House Seat 1: Jim Buck (R) House Seat 2: Lynn Kessler (D) 25th Legislative District House Seat 1: Joyce McDonald (R) House Seat 2: David Morell (R) 26th Legislative District House Seat 1: Edward Mitchell (R) House Seat 2: Brock Jackley (D) Senate Seat: Robert “Bob” Oke (R) 27th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation 28th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation 29th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation Senate Seat: No Recommendation 30th Legislative District House Seat 1: James Ferrell (R) House Seat 2: Mahlon Priest (R) Senate Seat: William Moore Jr. (R) 31st Legislative District House Seat 1: Daniel Roach (R) House Seat 2: Janice Shabro (R) Senate Seat: Pam Roach (R) 32nd Legislative District House Seat 1: Robert Ransom (R) House Seat 2: Margaret Wiggins (R) Senate Seat: Michael Plunkett (R) 33rd Legislative District House Seat 1: Peter Graves (R) House Seat 2: Henry Foote Jr. (R) Senate Seat: James Russell (R) 34th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: Larry Gilbert (R) Senate Seat: No Recommendation 35th Legislative District House Seat 1: Kathryn Haigh (D) House Seat 2: William “Bill” Eickmeyer (D) Senate Seat: Timothy Sheldon (D) 36th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: Rudy McCoy-Pantoja (R) Senate Seat: No Recommendation 37th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation Senate Seat: No Recommendation 38th Legislative District House Seat 1: Ervin Hoglund (R) House Seat 2: Gregory Lemke (R) Senate Seat: Aaron Reardon (D) 39th Legislative District House Seat 1: Dan Kristiansen (R) House Seat 2: Kirk Pearson (R) 40th Legislative District House Seat 1: David Quall (D) House Seat 2: Daniel Bartolovic (R) 41st Legislative District House Seat 1: Fred Jarrett (R) House Seat 2: Michael Wensman (R) 42nd Legislative District House Seat 1: Doug Erickson (R) House Seat 2: Kelli Linville (D) Senate Seat: Gardner Georgia Gardner (D) 43rd Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation Senate Seat: No Recommendation 44th Legislative District House Seat 1: Timothy Krivanek (R) House Seat 2: Randy Nichols (R) Senate Seat: David Schmidt (R) 45th Legislative District House Seat 1: Toby Nixon (R) House Seat 2: Elizabeth Bookspan (R) Senate Seat: William Finkbeiner (R) 46th Legislative District House Seat 1: No Recommendation House Seat 2: No Recommendation Senate Seat: Ken Jacobsen (D) 47th Legislative District House Seat 1: Philip Fortunato (R) House Seat 2: Jack Cairnes (R) Senate Seat: Stephen Johnson (R) 48th Legislative District House Seat 1: George Aiton (R) House Seat 2: Rodney Tom (R) Senate Seat: No Recommendation 49th Legislative District House Seat 1: Charles “Bill” Fromhold (D) House Seat 2: No Recommendation |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
For those unfamiliar with the WWC and the HHC feel free to contact us at [email protected]
**Protecting our Outdoor Heritage **Opposing Animal Rights Extremism **A United Sportsmen's Voice **The End of Apathy Join the WWC: http://www.w4wc.org |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
I have noticed it took the WWC over three weeks to update the Hunters Heritage endorsement list on the WWC website.
There was only limited corrections to make, and this takes three weeks? Was there reluctance from the leadership within WWC to make that update? How many people downloaded the in-correct list. |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
The WWC is one of the founding members of the HHC, and helped arrive at these recommendations. The HHC's Political consultant, Ed Owens, is also WWC's Political Committee Chairman. The WWC is in full agreement with the rec's. The delay in the revision was due to the lengthy absence of our webmaster (me). I was in WY chasing tasty mule deer and then, Wile E. Coyote :D I apoligise for the delay. There was one revision only, the addition of Doug Erickson in the 42nd after the HSUS endorsed the person he is up against. I have no doubt that Mr. Erickson will be re-elected.
There is much to do in the fight to preserve the outdoor heritage of this state, and there is never enough volunteers to get the job done as well as we would like. Mistakes happen. Infrequently to be sure, but they do happen. Sportsmen are encouraged to email the WWC and lend a hand. The Unity Campaign is starting to bear fruit and we are only limited by the amount of concened individuals that are willing to lend a day or a dollar to the fight. **Protecting our Outdoor Heritage **Opposing Animal Rights Extremism **A United Sportsmen's Voice **The End of Apathy **Join the WWC: http://www.w4wc.org |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
The Unity Campaign is starting to bear fruit and we are only limited by the amount of concened individuals
LMAO! UNITY!! Blah Blah,,, your sure you understand the meaning? Really! Think about it! and hopefully it will be outside from the ever apparent tunnel vision syndrome. The competition thinks outside the box.... |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
I heard that Mr. Erickson spent over eight hours working side by side the consumptive users of this state building duck blinds, not only for the hunter to use but also the non-consumptive user.
How was this demonstration recieved within the WWC? Gotta think outside the box! old tactic's are to primative,,, gotta be very asertive. Your competition is! Look for the light! |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
Otto, I'm not sure what you are getting at. Could you be a little more specific? What is wrong with building duck blinds that hunters and others can use? Or is that not what you are saying. Please elaborate on that, and the "unity" issue you seem to have.
http://www.wanwtf.org |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
WAN,,,
The message and my disconcern were received loud and clear to their receipiant. Unfortunante it had to be made here, but unanswered emails forced me to air on a public format. For the record the WWC is an outstanding organization that I have been involved with one way or another since 95....They have recently lost my involvment within the organanization due to few different reasons, Tunnel Vision (inability to think out of the box), Unity, Burnout, etc. etc. The frameworks and foundation is there but if the continual inability of even attempting to think a different thought or do it a different way will just allow them to tread water they have since 95... Change with the times or get left behind! Is our competition adapting? My frustrations are due in large part, that the consumptive user as a whole chooses not to get involved, thus causing the few that are involved to eventually get tired and depart. I am not the first and will not be the last!(it just took me a little longer) So step up to the plate, because this Hunter Advocate is stepping down, to be just part of the lazy crowd that uses and chooses mot to protect our heritages.. |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
before it aksed here it is,,
Stay focused! to many do to much and not doing the important things correct. Prioritze! find out what is the most important things to do! and learn to do those things damn well before taking on more! even if it means some things go un-checked at least the higher priority things are being done correctly. As time goes on then take on more but always make sure the basics are kept basic and are completed. Strong Leadership! that knows the knack for getting others to work for you! Spokesperson,, someone that is a strong figure and has the ability to get people to want to become involved just because of "their" involvemnet (promotion 101) which in turn helps alleviate the problems of too much on the plate for leadership of the group. It will also help shed the image of the fat old man standing at the sportsman show booth, "stating you better get involved or else" The list could continue but I will leave what I percieve as dirty laundry out, for the good of the group in hopes that they start looking outside the box and making changes! |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
<font color=blue>This Saturday is the NARN monthly meeting and we are going to have a wonderful guest speaker, Courtney Dillard, speaking about effective communication regarding animal issues. This is sure to be a rewarding presentation and the monthly meetings are a great way to get involved and take part in the direction of NARN</font id=blue>
Courtney will lead a discussion of that touches on how to most effectively communicate with people regarding vegetarianism and other issues relating to animals. The talk will address topics such as the importance of audience analysis, how to set goals for communication, message tone, message delivery, and more, and will be followed by a short question and answer period. <font color=blue> NARN on TV Channel 29/77 Cable Public Access. These shows are presented and titled by NARN. "Pigs" on Wednesday, November 6 @ 10:30pm - 11</font id=blue> ------------------------------------------------------------------ The above are just a few things I noticed our local NARN group doing. They do this on a regular basis. The above excerpts came from their email newsletter. There are atleast three groups locally doing this kind of communication Just sending out the newsletter bi-weekly instead of doing a costly outdated snail mail newsletter is one smart step! (saves $$ and saves time plus it's current info) Come on H4L tell us all what your doing or is the silence just agreeance that change is necessary. The archaic ways things have been transpiring year after year will just lead us again to the losers circle. Are ya getting my drift yet? PROACTIVITY not REACTIVITY |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
Otto, a newsletter is a great idea, however, until you have a base of subscribers you won't be touching the people you need to. I've put out a e-newsletter for 2 years now, and only have at most 40 people on the mailing list. Something draws these people to subscribe for these letters - I would love to have that kind of readership base. But I do agree w/you - we need to be proactive and not reactive. Perhaps part of the problem lay with all the different organizations competing for their specific market - NWTF RMEF DU - all specific organizations geared toward a specific hunter. I think what WWC is attempting is to gather these organizations (or at least the people who support them) under one umbrella. Though still in its infancy, I think they are heading in the right direction. Costs of running any kind of chapter or organization costs $$$ and lots of it. Sending out a newsletter alone (snail mail) puts a huge dent in your operating budget - that is why they raffle guns and equipment to help fund it all. Membership helps a small bit, but it is the banquets and such that pull in the operating budgets.
How many newsletters are forwarded to your (your meaning those who sign up for mailing lists not specifically "you") friends and families who share our interests in the outdoors? http://www.wanwtf.org |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
Information flow is important. The WWC has a mailing list that is approaching @ 100 subscribers now. It's a low volume list. The Hunters Heritage Council (HHC) has a list with over 300 subscribers. That list is mostly natural resource based articles and announcements, mostly for WA state but also posts things of interest from other states as well. I have a list for Ted Nugent United Sportsmen of WA (ID, MT, WY, OR, AK as well) The WA list is growing slowly with around 60 or 70 subscribers. Then there is a Hunt4life of WA list too. We encourage all state orgs to have email lists to get information to their membership. This ia part of the WWC unity campaign... taking the information from the HHC, WWC, CRWM and other sources and get it out to interested and like minded parties for improved awareness and activism. It's a slow process but its growing thanks to many good folks and the leaders of many state sporting groups.
I'll post the subscribe addys for the HHC and WWC lists later. |
RE: Washington State Voting Recommendations 2002
I think the old saying "my vote doesnt count" has just about been put to rest over the last couple elections. Ya think!
***************** Control of Legislature hangs on handful of seats By PAUL QUEARY The Associated Press 11/6/02 4:40 AM SEATTLE (AP) -- With thousands of absentee ballots still in the mail, control of the Washington Legislature rested with a handful of House and Senate races that were too close to call Wednesday morning. Democrats were leading in enough races to maintain control of the 98-member House, but 15 races were too close to call. In the 49-member Senate, five races crucial to deciding which party would hold the majority were too close to call, and Democrats had to win at least one to keep control. "I'm a little concerned," said incumbent Republican Sen. Bob Oke, locked in a dead heat with Democrat Betty Ringlee on the Kitsap Peninsula. "Who controls the Senate is going to be up in the air for a week or ten days, maybe more." The District 26 race centered on Ringlee's criticism of Oke's support for toll bridges across the Tacoma Narrows. In District 31, which covers part of King and Pierce counties, veteran Republican Pam Roach was leading Democratic challenger Yvonne Ward 52 percent to 48 percent with most of the vote counted except for late absentees. In a bitter campaign, Ward accused Roach of neglecting her Senate duties and Roach called Ward a liar. In District 42, incumbent Democrat Georgia Gardner was leading Republican Dale Brandland, the longtime Whatcom County sheriff, 49 percent to 46 percent. Gardner had been expected to struggle against Brandland, who won the primary handily. In District 44, GOP Rep. Dave Schmidt had 53 percent of the vote in a race with Democrat Phil Doerflein to succeed retiring Sen. Jeanine Long, R-Mill Creek. In Spokane, Senate Minority Leader Jim West led Democrat Laurie Dolan, 52 percent to 48 percent with only late absentee ballots uncounted in a race that set records for legislative campaign spending and blanketed the city's airwaves with advertising. In the House, fewer than two dozen races were competitive. Of those, Democrats were leading in 14 early Wednesday. If those trends continue, Democrats would hold 51 seats in the House, but 15 races were too close to call. "It's too early to say for sure," cautioned House Speaker Frank Chopp, D-Seattle, "but it's looking good right now." In Snohomish County, John McCoy, a Tulalip tribal official, was leading Republican Erv Hoglund for an open seat in District 38. Hoglund attacked McCoy over the tribe's tax advantage late in the campaign, a tactic denounced by Gov. Gary Locke as racist. At least two incumbents appeared headed for defeat. Rep. Jim Dunn, R-Vancouver, was trailing Democratic challenger Deb Wallace with much of the vote counted in the 17th District. In a battle of similar names from Pierce County, Democratic challenger Dawn Morrell was leading incumbent Republican Dave Morell. Democrats were also trying to make inroads in open seats. Democrat Judy Clibborn had a narrow lead over Republican Mike Wensman in the Mercer Island district long held by GOP Rep. Ida Ballasiotes, who retired this year. Democrat Greg Markley and Republican Skip Priest were virtually tied for the Federal Way seat vacated this year by Republican Maryann Mitchell. The party that wins the majority in each chamber gets the dubious honor of tackling the projected $2 billion hole in the two-year budget for the period beginning July 1. But that didn't discourage both parties -- or their backers among corporations, unions, professional groups and other special interests -- from campaigning hard and spending big. Legislative candidates raised more than $14 million, and special interests spent roughly $1 million more on last-second advertisements and direct mail. Hot proposals such as raising taxes, expanding gambling, limiting medical malpractice awards and reversing voter-approved cost-of-living raises for teachers could hinge on which party controls the House and Senate. In recent years, control has seesawed between the parties, sometimes on a daily basis. From 1999 through 2001, the House was split 49-49 until the tie was broken by a special election last year, giving Democrats a 50-48 advantage. In the Senate, Democrats had a one-vote advantage, and that majority occasionally evaporated when maverick Democrat Tim Sheldon, D-Potlatch, sided with Republicans, giving the GOP a temporary one-vote majority. ------ On the Net: Election Results: http://www.vote.wa.gov |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.