Testing OLD Pyrodex RS VS New day Pyrodex RS
10-12-2016, 10:26 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
Testing OLD Pyrodex RS VS New day Pyrodex RS
I finally was able to get out and shoot the super old can of Pyrodex RS VS a fresh can of Pyrodex RS. I started with accuracy test first since that's a lot more fun than shooting over the Chrony.
70gr Volume
.020" patches
.490" round balls
Buckskinners patch lube
50 yard distance.
6 O'clock hole is 3 shots with the NEW can of RS and the 12 O'clock group is with the old RS. I used 2 different aiming points to prevent the shots from running together.
The new can shot quite a bit tighter, but I think that's due to be being able to get a precise POI on the bulls eye where as with the 12 o'clock hold, My bulls eye was covered up. Both shot flawless, but I did notice a big difference when seating the ball.
The old RS is super strong and will not compress. The new RS seems crumbly and easily compresses. I will be taking a picture of both pictures side by side. The old stuff seems like it was a coating on it.
70gr Volume
.020" patches
.490" round balls
Buckskinners patch lube
50 yard distance.
6 O'clock hole is 3 shots with the NEW can of RS and the 12 O'clock group is with the old RS. I used 2 different aiming points to prevent the shots from running together.
The new can shot quite a bit tighter, but I think that's due to be being able to get a precise POI on the bulls eye where as with the 12 o'clock hold, My bulls eye was covered up. Both shot flawless, but I did notice a big difference when seating the ball.
The old RS is super strong and will not compress. The new RS seems crumbly and easily compresses. I will be taking a picture of both pictures side by side. The old stuff seems like it was a coating on it.
Last edited by MountainDevil54; 09-23-2018 at 12:47 PM.
10-14-2016, 08:31 AM
#4
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia / West Virginia
Posts: 4,906
Man I wonder how old that is? I've been shooting RS since the late 80's, and never saw a can like that.
In my experience, the powder has not changed when kept dry and climate controlled. I shot a can of 10yo RS along with a can of new (probably 5+yrs ago) and couldn't detect a difference.
Good shooting!
In my experience, the powder has not changed when kept dry and climate controlled. I shot a can of 10yo RS along with a can of new (probably 5+yrs ago) and couldn't detect a difference.
Good shooting!
10-14-2016, 10:26 AM
#5
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comance county, OK
Posts: 11,408
Comparing very old Pyrodex against new Pyrodex for possible powder degradation is problematic because they are not the same powder. Pyrodex has undergone several modifications since the original patent in the 1970s. New Pyrodex is more powerful that the earlier powder.
This is the patent formulation:
45 parts of potassium nitrate
9 parts of charcoal
6 parts of sulfur
19 parts of potassium perchlorate
11 parts of sodium benzoate
6 parts of dicyanamide
1 to 4 parts of water
The current SDS for Pyrodex lists:
30 parts of potassium nitrate
8 parts of charcoal
8 parts of sulfur
30 parts of potassium perchlorate
http://www.pyrodex.com/msds.html
This is the patent formulation:
45 parts of potassium nitrate
9 parts of charcoal
6 parts of sulfur
19 parts of potassium perchlorate
11 parts of sodium benzoate
6 parts of dicyanamide
1 to 4 parts of water
The current SDS for Pyrodex lists:
30 parts of potassium nitrate
8 parts of charcoal
8 parts of sulfur
30 parts of potassium perchlorate
http://www.pyrodex.com/msds.html
Last edited by falcon; 10-14-2016 at 11:25 AM.
