Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-07-2003 | 03:56 PM
  #11  
Sagittarius's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: In a Tarpon Boat
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

Rangeball,

Sure, you can do that if you wish.
Some guys use both an up pin and a cross hair together with their competition scopes.
I have a Sight Master Elite 2000 hunting sight that has both a green cross hair and an orange up pin.
Cross hair in front with up pin behind.
Just line the up pin in the center of cross hair, works great.
That' s why guys like to dab the center of the green cross hair with an fluorescent orange lip stick when they' re not using the up pin.
On the 6lb test line...
That is the size recommended by most but experiment and get the size you can see well and works best for you.


Sag.
Sagittarius is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-2003 | 03:58 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

There is no doubt that having a static rear and front sight to align will provide best accuracy, However, you must consider some important aspects of the method before you use the system for bowhunting

Aside from what an individual has trained/conditioned himself or herself to do, that is counter to the norm, there are (2) basic, but critical, differences between using a common bowhunting sight and a sight having rear and front alignment as you would find on a handgun or shoulder weapon.

1. Using a standard bowhunting sight, you quickly position and align the sight on the target, but you (then) bring the " spot" on the deer into sharp focus, and the bow sight (pin, etc.) should be out of focus.

2. When using a sight that has a rear and front alignment system, you must focus on the rear and front sights, with the primary focus being on the front sight. The target/spot (POA) MUST now be out focus or you are not correctly sighting and you will most likely miss your POA.


Unless, when bowhunting, you have always used a sight picture as is used with a handgun or shoulder weapon, you will probably discover that the system does not work for you and that your accuracy in the field has left you as fast as the deer you just missed.

If you believe that you can properly align the rear sight with the front sight, and sharply focus on the front sight and your POA on the deer, your are sadly mistaken. It is not visually possible to sharply focus on a close object and a distant object at the same time. If you try, you will visually (focus) bounce back and forth from the sight to the spot, from the spot to the sight, etc. You will never acquire a proper sight picture, you will condition yourself to always " bounce," and you will face the problem of possibly releasing, or having to release, while using the wrong sight picture.

Some bowhunters believe that a string peep-sight is for alignment. It is not. It is primarily for enabling a consistent anchor and eye level. I know about the technique where you align the sight pin in the peep sight, and that some shooters successfully use the method.

However, I have always had questions regarding the technique. Because the method is the same as I have just described. If you are focusing on the front pin to align the pin in the peep-sight, that means you must bring the (front) pin into sharp focus. The front pin is closer than the deer. How do you sharply focus on a close pin and the spot on distant deer at the same? You can' t.

The shooters using the method of aligning the pin the peep-sight, have to be:

1. Quickly aligning the pin in the peep-sight, locating the pin on the target, and then sharply focusing on the POA; with pin out of focus and kept in position and alignment using peripheral-like vision, or

2. Sharply focusing and aligning the pin in the peep-sight, locating the pin on the target, and aiming with the " spot" out of focus, or

3. Doing both, and focusing (bouncing) back and forth.

If the shooter that is using the above method is consistently accurate in the field, I would say that he or she is using method #1, or method #2 because they know how.

If you are not skilled/conditioned to use a sight system that has a rear sight and front blade/pin, you will probably " bounce" your focus. Worse, just as you are about to shoot, you will unconsciously revert to the standard bow sighting method you have been used to; you will bring the deer/spot into sharp focus and you will leave the front sight of the system out of focus. However, in doing so you will 9unconsciously) lower the rear sight fixture because you no longer need it and it is blocking your view to the front blade/pin. Hence, you will shoot low.

c903 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-2003 | 08:51 PM
  #13  
TFOX's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

Sorry c903,wrong again.[:-]


A peep when used properly is for centering the pin and that is it.Your anchor should already be established.My anchor is very consistant and I can shut my eyes,pull back,anchor and then open my eyes and the peep will be dead center of my eye.(this should be the goal of everyone.)Now all is left is to put the pin on the target and then center the pin or in my case when target shooting,the housing with the peep.Not saying that using a peep for helping with anchor won' t help with a hunting setup but it is not what is to be concidered by most target shooters to be the correct method.


When aiming,the pin should be almost superimposed on the target.The main point of focus is the spot you want to hit and not the pin.This is easiest with both eyes open.


When using these products for centering the pin,who cares if the back sight is in perfect focus.If the back sight will help align the pin on the target ,who cares.
TFOX is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 12:00 AM
  #14  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

TFOX:

Speaking in terms that apply to bowhunting;, not target shooting, if that is what you believe and that is how you do or wish to do, go for it. However, I am quite confident when I say: if you want to be correct, or use the correct sighting methods, I suggest you do some research regarding sight pictures in accordance with the sighting system being used, and for what purpose a peep is PRIMARILY and GENERALLY used by many, or most, bowhunters.

I used a peep-sight for bowhunting for a brief period, but haven' t for a long time. However, when I did, I considered the peep (chiefly) as device to enable a consistent anchor and eye level. When I sighted on a deer, I quickly referenced the pin in the peep but immediately focused on the POA, with the pin out of focus. In other words; once on the peep (bowhunting), my pin became my rear sight and, theoretically, the spot (in sharp focus) on the deer became my front sight.

If a peep is mandatory as a rear sight, chiefly used to align the pin, how is it that many, many, very accurate shooters do not use a peep sight; some using a kisser as an anchor reference, and some using nothing but the placement of their release hand?

As for a sight pin, or a front sight blade being " superimposed" on the " spot," I suppose you could say that about any sighting pin, bead, or blade. Whether the sighting system demands that you bring the " spot" into sharp focus, or the front sight in sharp focus, I suppose you could say the target and the sight appears to be superimposed. However, I prefer to place and align my sight on target, or even reference my sight on target.

You were not listening; or in this case you did not thoroughly read and/or comprehend. Go back, find what I said …,and explained, regarding the two different sighting devices. I know that when using a common bow sight, you bring the (only) the target/spot (POA) into sharp focus; that is what I said. I also know that the rear sight is then out of focus (fuzzy); that is what I said.

RE:

When using these products for centering the pin, who cares if the back sight is in perfect focus. If the back sight will help align the pin on the target, who cares.
I am not quite sure what you are trying to say with this statement, so I will reply as though I do.

No, when using " these products," the one(s) that have a rear and front sight, you do not want the rear sight in " perfect" focus. However, you still have to align the front sight with the rear sight or you just spent money for a very funny looking pin sight.

As for your statement; If the back sight will help align the pin on the target ,who cares." I have no idea of what point you are trying to make.



c903 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 07:49 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

I must be a freak then, as I was able to use the Yikes rear sight very well and shoot very accurately with all my focus on the target. I didn' t have problems initially that I had to deal with, I just installed, lined up, and shot away...
Rangeball is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 10:06 AM
  #16  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

OR, you can make this WHOLE argument moot by using a smaller peep, and shooting with both eyes open.
You can use a " peep eliminator" if you need more help with your form...but most importantly, with a small peep, and BOTH eyes open, you can see your target, AND your sight in perfect focus.
If you have fiber optic pins with a light, you can even shoot in near TOTAL darkness. Basically if you can see your target, you can hit it..
Your peep sight IS your rear sight...and gives a MUCH longer sight plane than the peep eliminators (save for the " No-peep" but that one takes your eye off target). A SMALL peep keeps things in focus (take your glasses off, and look through a target peep sometime) It isn' t small to make it easier to keep the pin centered, but to aid in focus.
Your NON dominant eye simply has to look at the target.
Mahly13 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 10:34 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

Mahly13, welcome to the board...

I use the No-peep and don' t take my eyes off the target. It' s simply part of my sight picture that is easily checked with peripheral vision...
Rangeball is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 12:02 PM
  #18  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

Rangeball:

I doubt that you are a freak.

If you are focusing on the target, you have comprised the true purpose of a sighting system having a rear and front sight, regardless of the accuracy you have obtained. That is well and good if the method you are using allows you to dispense with a string " peep sight."

However, you are spinning your wheels if you are trying to convince me that you are able to visually, clearly, and precisely hold the front sight centered (center and height) in the rear sight, especially in any small (rear) aperture, and have the POA (spot) in sharp focus at the same time.

If you are sharply focusing on the target/spot after you have aligned your sights, you are now peripherally referencing an out-of-focus front sight to an out-of-focus rear sight to the target when you shoot. When shooting at immobile targets on a range, you have time to " bounce" your focus from sight to target and from target to sight until you are satisfied that your sight picture is consistently correct….. as long as you can hold the bow steady. In the field, with a deer at close range, and having very limited time to shoot, you will not have that opportunity.

The main point I am trying to make is; any person considering installing such a sighting system on a bow for bowhunting purpose, believing that they will be able to use the sight as they would with a handgun or shoulder weapon, is in for a disappointment Especially when they realize they have spent a bunch of money for something that ended up being useful for nothing more than a costly and weird looking " pin" sight.

The one inherent and disadvantageous aspect about a standard bow sight is that the primary sighting pin is out-of-focus when you shoot. That is why a small pin is usually better then a large pin. When focusing on the deer, the pin becomes blurry and is " fuzzy" around the edges of the pin. The larger the pin, the larger the " fuzzy" edges are. I do not believe I have to explain what that can do to your sight picture. However, it is a condition that most bow shooters must and are able to effectively adapt to.

Now enter a sighting system having a rear and front sight.

You now have only one sight pin. That is ok if you are using just one pin without a rear aperture that the pin is dependent on for proper alignment. You simply raise or lower the pin (POA) ….actually, your bow, in accordance with the distance the deer is, and in accordance with the known trajectory of your shaft that you have predetermined. How are you able to do the same if your pin alignment is dependent upon a rear sight aperture?

With a firearm, you raise or lower the amount of front sight that is viewed in the rear sight. To do that, the front sight must be in sharp focus throughout the shot, which means that the POA will not be in sharp focus. No matter how much you would like to have it both ways, you cannot.

So now, you realize you cannot have the pin and the POA in sharp focus at the same time. What do you do?

To be able to adjust your elevation in accordance with the distance the deer is at; you must focus on your front sight to establish the correct height in your rear aperture. That means the deer, and your POA on the deer, will be out of focus. A deer is not white in color with a crisp and defined black circle or silhouette on its body. A deer blends into its surroundings, and your critical POA is blended into the deer' s body…and the deer may be moving. Where do you aim the sight on a target that is (target) not only out of focus, but also has no contrast and may be moving? If you do shoot under these conditions, you will be very lucky to hit the deer, let alone an 8" to 9" kill-zone.

Once you realize that you cannot focus on the sight and your POA at the same time, and that due to the obscured and blended conditions of your (moving) target, especially in shadows or low light; having the " pin" in sharp focus is out of the question, and you now realize that you cannot reference your front sight to the rear aperture throughout your shot.

So now you focus on your " spot." Whoops, big problem! Instead of seeing a small pin that is slightly blurred, but can still be accurately registered on the target, you notice that there is now a large out-of-focus fuzzy blob in your sight picture, caused by the front and rear sight being superimposed. You quickly struggle to find just the " pin." In doing so, you realize you have but one option; you slightly tilt your bow to drop the rear sight out of the way so that you can see, at least, some of the front pin. That adjustment will raise the front pin.

Guess what you now have to do now that you have raised your front pin? Lower your point of aim on the " spot." Guess how much lower your shaft will now hit. That entire process is going on when you have limited time to make the shot.

Buy the system if that is your desire. However, know as many facts as you can, before you do. Most important, never equate " target shooting" exactly to all " bowhunting" conditions.
c903 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 03:41 PM
  #19  
TFOX's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

C903


What the heck is the difference between sighting on a 3-d target and sighting on an animal.



The process is the same and there is a correct way and a wrong way.Bowhunters generally do it in a way that isn' t correct but sufficient.If you have to move your head to line up the peep with the eye,the peep isn' t in the right place or your anchor isn' t very good.



I know all to well how someone can shoot without a peep or a kisser and be extremely accurate,I myself can do this quite effectively but it causes problems when shooting downhill or uphill,because there is no rear sigtht to keep you in line.As a matter of fact,I have NEVER had a kisser on any bow of mine.




My statement meant that if the back sight is out of focus,you can still use it to help with alignment,so who cares if it is out of focus,it still performs the task it was designed to do.
TFOX is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2003 | 03:57 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Another peepless option. Seen this yet?

What TFOX said has been my experience. I just love it when other people tell me what' s in my mind or how I see things...

Oh well, maybe I really am a freak
Rangeball is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.