![]() |
[Deleted]
[Deleted by Admins]
|
RE: Two blades vs three
Navy, congratulations on never making a margnal hit. You asked a lot of questions with a lot " depends" type answers.
Don' t you lose 50% of your cutting ability with a two blade over a three blade? On a marginal hit the extra blade may slice an artery. A two blade with 1 1/8" diameter is bigger than a three blade with a 1 1/8" diameter. Right |
[Deleted]
[Deleted by Admins]
|
RE: Two blades vs three
?e
Don' t you lose 50% of your cutting ability with a two blade over a three blade The way I see it on the two-blade vs. three-blade issue is that there are advantages and disadvantages to both. Two-blades are the most easily sharpened/resharpened in my opinion. Two blades reduce the likelhood of jamming in bone. Two blades require less KE to get the same penetration. Two blades kill very effectively. Three blades give you an additional blade and, therefore, an additional opportunity to hit a major artery/blood vessel as it passes through. Three-blades make a larger entry wound and often provide a better blood trail. Three-blades CAN be designed to be stronger than two-blades and CAN be designed to reduce the possibility of planing. However, that' s not to say that any given three-blade is designed to improve on either - it' s just potential for the design - and some DO take advantage of that potential. The head that flies best; is sharpest and works best with the level of KE your setup provides is the best - 2 blade, 3 blade, 4 blade... whatever. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.