Tuning my new DC Pat, does this look right?
04-08-2003 | 12:18 PM
#21
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Goodyear AZ US
RE: Tuning my new DC Pat, does this look right?
JeffB
I' m using the Bowtech cable slide and getting no contact on the cables. I even went out and put a NAP 800 prong rest on and tuned it to bullet holes checking for vane clearance all the way. It ended up being way out there just like the NAP 4000 fall away rest. Case closed.
I' m using the Bowtech cable slide and getting no contact on the cables. I even went out and put a NAP 800 prong rest on and tuned it to bullet holes checking for vane clearance all the way. It ended up being way out there just like the NAP 4000 fall away rest. Case closed.
04-08-2003 | 05:23 PM
#22
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
From: CT, USA
RE: Tuning my new DC Pat, does this look right?
Cargo,
Actually I was not referring to cable/fletching contact, but simply added torque. It' s like the old days of adjustable cable guards: the more clearance you set it for (more torque on the cables), the farther your sights would drift to the left (for a righty)
Dave,
Obviously the bow is setup from the factory for minimal lean with the installed slide. Using the Sims will likely put a bit more torque on the harness and hence limbs, but it should not be overly so. Try it , shoot it and see what happens.
JeffB
Actually I was not referring to cable/fletching contact, but simply added torque. It' s like the old days of adjustable cable guards: the more clearance you set it for (more torque on the cables), the farther your sights would drift to the left (for a righty)
Dave,
Obviously the bow is setup from the factory for minimal lean with the installed slide. Using the Sims will likely put a bit more torque on the harness and hence limbs, but it should not be overly so. Try it , shoot it and see what happens.
JeffB
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
killadoe
Bowhunting
0
05-21-2008 12:16 PM
