Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Technical
 Arrow penetration vs. weight >

Arrow penetration vs. weight

Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Arrow penetration vs. weight

Old 06-23-2007, 01:13 PM
  #31  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,869
Default RE: Arrow penetration vs. weight

ORIGINAL: Len in Maryland

Let's see if I've got this straight. You're taking two 2216 arrows of different weights, which means that they would have to have different lengths and/or tip weights to attain the weight difference. In any event they could well have different spines. You're comparing them to an unknown length, unknown spine and unknowndiameter Beman carbon arrow (unknown at least to us).

We also weren't told as to whether or not they were even shot out of the same bow and if that bow was properly tuned to any one of those arrows. And as stated, the medium into which the arrows were shot even complicated the puzzle. A better test would have been to build a set of identical arrows and increase the weight of one in a variety of ways.
Been gone for a while and most likely will not be back for a while, but here's all I was looking at.

What I have heard is heavier will penetrate better. So I made up 3 arrows. The 2216'swith different headsand vanes. The beman, the arrow I use and have for a season was what it is.

I shot it into a target, back yard bucky, out of the same bow. No funny business. Just a guy shooting some arrows at a target and seeing what would happen. They all shot well from 20 yards.

If there's more to penetration than weight so be it, but the arguments I've read here don't deviate much from that. As it is if I was to just take it for granted that heavier was better and knew nothing else much about things I'd be heading into the woods with what I thought and was told was the ticket. Things may have turned out just as good but the story wouldn't have been penetration of the much heavier arrow. Most likleyunder shooting an animal for no good reason is whatI concluded.Still fun to shoot.

I don't think I shot broadheads at first even though I think I did later and the results were the same. They would have been thunderheads. 100's and 125's.

I really just shot some heavier arrows expecting them to plow through and they didn't. End of story. They all shot very well and I don't think anyone would have had a problem using them just the way they were. None of that tuning stuff was an issue.
nodog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roskoe
Technical
23
07-23-2007 04:19 AM
HILLBILLYJLM
Technical
13
08-14-2005 08:58 AM
elkaddict
Technical
22
11-04-2004 01:51 PM
titleist_03
Technical
6
06-06-2003 12:05 PM
bighunter55555
Technical
1
01-20-2003 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: Arrow penetration vs. weight


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.