![]() |
Political Forum MOD?
Who is the MOD of the political forum? CalHunter has been MIA since May and there is a member who has been perma-banned more than 100 times who is cluttering to forum with garbage. So if CalHunter is no longer coming to the forum exactly who has over watch of the most volatile forum on the site?
|
Please make use of the Report Post button. It will alert the mod team to any post that you believe breaks the forum rules.
|
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 4338517)
Please make use of the Report Post button. It will alert the mod team to any post that you believe breaks the forum rules.
|
Perma ban is forever.
A Temp ban is for a set amount of time and how I see it there are several who have been Temp banned. JW |
It doesn't sound like you guys are talking about the same thing.
|
I hope CalHunter is OK. I miss his consistent moderating. He always kept it from becoming the "wild west". Staying ahead of the spammers and the banned members coming back with aliases is a full time job for a moderator. The job definitely is difficult and a mod often feels like they are trying to plug a leaking dam with mud.
|
I've lurked on this site for a long time and recall reading occasional posts where he mentioned permabanning some guy who kept coming back with aliases. Doesn't admin have a way to fix a persistent spammer like that?
Edit--I just checked the forum leaders link and none of the mods or admin are logged on. That may be part of the problem. |
Your reports are being read. For me I see no problem.
Politics no one ever agrees. Politics everyone is name calling. And let's get this cleared up. A Perma-ban or Permanent Ban is for-ever. A Temp-ban ot Temporary Ban is for a set amount of time. IF we can find evidence of re-registering after you have been Permanently Removed we will act quickly to remove you. JW |
What is the penalty for someone that is temp banned using an alias during the temp ban to post during that time?
It should be perma ban in my book. |
Originally Posted by flags
(Post 4338511)
Who is the MOD of the political forum? CalHunter has been MIA since May and there is a member who has been perma-banned more than 100 times who is cluttering to forum with garbage. So if CalHunter is no longer coming to the forum exactly who has over watch of the most volatile forum on the site?
|
Originally Posted by Gm54-120
(Post 4338582)
What is the penalty for someone that is temp banned using an alias during the temp ban to post during that time?
It should be perma ban in my book. |
Yes, as in it is a perma ban for side stepping a temp ban?
My question is unrelated to the political forum. |
Wouldn't the same IP address give it away?
|
Originally Posted by Gm54-120
(Post 4338582)
What is the penalty for someone that is temp banned using an alias during the temp ban to post during that time?
It should be perma ban in my book. No problem there, If caught. JW |
Originally Posted by elkman30
(Post 4338587)
Wouldn't the same IP address give it away?
|
Maybe we should ask Putin and his boys to look into this.
|
Maybe you shouldn't try to be a comedian. I am not sure you are not one of the people Flags and GM are talking about.
|
Being a mod is a tough job especially since it is strictly a volunteer position with no compensation. The list of Super Mods is quite long but the reality is only a few have actually done mod work in the last year and even more haven't even logged in. Admin needs to weed out the inactive mods and then get interested members who have some leadership qualities to volunteer to help out. Without a good Mod group the site will continue to plummet in the eyes of the good members who keep it going. If you don't like how it is run do something about it.
|
Points well made. But in fairness, the OP mentioned a specific member who had previously been permabanned 100 times now posting again under an alias. The OP didn't say the language of the post was a violation-he said the member signing up and posting under the 101st name or whatever alias was the violation. I can see why flags might get a little miffed. He's pointed out what is a violation of the rules at least 3 times and has been told by admin and a mod that it's not a rules violation. Based on flags post and the responses by Ibobi and JW, it looks like they didn't read through his post or didn't understand it.
On a separate issue, if it's okay for somebody who is permabanned to come back under an alias or new name, then why have rules or permaban anybody. That would make this a free for all in the forums but maybe that's what HuntingNet is going for? I'm not trying to create a stink or problem but I can see why flags is getting a bit exasperated. |
Originally Posted by Gm54-120
(Post 4338595)
Yes but its easy to get around that. It takes very little skill or knowledge to mask your IP through a proxy. I just tested my anonymous browser and it connected just fine.
|
Bigbuck just came off a 6 month Temp ban.
It was not a Permanent Ban. We clear about that now! I have read and re-read the reported post. Its political opinion no more no less.. I see no HNI rule infractions. SO FAR. I will do nothing further, this is a Technical Help forum. Use it as such. JW |
I didn't think flags was talking about Bigbuck but maybe I have it wrong. If so, my apologies.
|
Originally Posted by JW
(Post 4338524)
Perma ban is forever.
A Temp ban is for a set amount of time and how I see it there are several who have been Temp banned. JW |
Originally Posted by elkman30
(Post 4338637)
I didn't think flags was talking about Bigbuck but maybe I have it wrong. If so, my apologies.
|
Originally Posted by elkman30
(Post 4338624)
Points well made. But in fairness, the OP mentioned a specific member who had previously been permabanned 100 times now posting again under an alias. The OP didn't say the language of the post was a violation-he said the member signing up and posting under the 101st name or whatever alias was the violation. I can see why flags might get a little miffed. He's pointed out what is a violation of the rules at least 3 times and has been told by admin and a mod that it's not a rules violation. Based on flags post and the responses by Ibobi and JW, it looks like they didn't read through his post or didn't understand it.
On a separate issue, if it's okay for somebody who is permabanned to come back under an alias or new name, then why have rules or permaban anybody. That would make this a free for all in the forums but maybe that's what HuntingNet is going for? I'm not trying to create a stink or problem but I can see why flags is getting a bit exasperated.
|
Originally Posted by flags
(Post 4338674)
Nope, not him. It is the guy posting a 6CreedMoor. He has been banned more than 100 times and keeps coming back with a new name. In a few weeks if the MODs don't take action he will begin with serious insults and then the racism will start. that is the way he does business and that is why CAL always shut him down. Mark my words that guy's intent is to disrupt the forum because he has been trying to do it for a couple of years.
|
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 4338688)
Let us know when he posts something that violates the rules, and we'll apply the rules. Until then there is no evidence.
|
The member Flags is talking about is Creedmore.
|
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 4338687)
Well, you're wrong on pretty much all your points here, sorry to point out.
|
Originally Posted by elkman30
(Post 4338701)
Ok. If you say I'm wrong. But out of curiosity, you mentioned a different member named Bigbuck in your original comment and flags has now clarified said he was talking about 6CreedMoor. Since your original comment was based upon looking at the history or whatever of Bigbuck, there shouldn't have been any "evidence." The question now would be is there any evidence with regard to "6Creedmoor" who flags has now identified and now Champlain Islander has confirmed that he was previously permabanned over "100 times." I know Champlain islander used to be a moderator so would assume he is in a position to know about these previous permabans. You posted that flags should let you know when this 6creedmoor has posted something that violates the rules. According to your above quote directed at me, if 6CreedMoor has previously been permabanned under another name, that would constitute a rules violation and subsequent permaban. Or do you see this differently?
|
Originally Posted by elkman30
(Post 4338701)
Ok. If you say I'm wrong. But out of curiosity, you mentioned a different member named Bigbuck in your original comment and flags has now clarified said he was talking about 6CreedMoor. Since your original comment was based upon looking at the history or whatever of Bigbuck, there shouldn't have been any "evidence." The question now would be is there any evidence with regard to "6Creedmoor" who flags has now identified and now Champlain Islander has confirmed that he was previously permabanned over "100 times." I know Champlain islander used to be a moderator so would assume he is in a position to know about these previous permabans. You posted that flags should let you know when this 6creedmoor has posted something that violates the rules. According to your above quote directed at me, if 6CreedMoor has previously been permabanned under another name, that would constitute a rules violation and subsequent permaban. Or do you see this differently?
|
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 4338703)
I never mentioned bigbuck. Show me evidence that 6creedmor is an alias? IP address is unique to HN. What other info is being used to determine that this is a sockpuppet account? I'd be curious, because other than name, email address, and IP address, HN doesn't track any data.
|
Problem was I was guessing based on comments as we where provided no names, no data but are given a link to follow.
Adding exact usernames would help. So I saw BigBuck had vome off a Temp ban. My aplologies to him. JW |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.