Political Forum MOD?
07-19-2018, 06:58 PM
#21
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,436
Bigbuck just came off a 6 month Temp ban.
It was not a Permanent Ban.
We clear about that now!
I have read and re-read the reported post. Its political opinion no more no less..
I see no HNI rule infractions. SO FAR.
I will do nothing further, this is a Technical Help forum.
Use it as such.
JW
It was not a Permanent Ban.
We clear about that now!
I have read and re-read the reported post. Its political opinion no more no less..
I see no HNI rule infractions. SO FAR.
I will do nothing further, this is a Technical Help forum.
Use it as such.
JW
07-20-2018, 08:29 AM
#23
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,230
Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. It is the same guy over and over that comes up with new user names. CAL was tracking him through is ISP and banned him over 100 times. The guy always starts the same way and after a few low key posts for a week or so he begins to badmouth, and insult other members and then begins the racism. That's why CAL always shut him down.
07-20-2018, 08:33 AM
#24
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,230
Nope, not him. It is the guy posting a 6CreedMoor. He has been banned more than 100 times and keeps coming back with a new name. In a few weeks if the MODs don't take action he will begin with serious insults and then the racism will start. that is the way he does business and that is why CAL always shut him down. Mark my words that guy's intent is to disrupt the forum because he has been trying to do it for a couple of years.
07-20-2018, 09:53 AM
#25
Typical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 557
Points well made. But in fairness, the OP mentioned a specific member who had previously been permabanned 100 times now posting again under an alias. The OP didn't say the language of the post was a violation-he said the member signing up and posting under the 101st name or whatever alias was the violation. I can see why flags might get a little miffed. He's pointed out what is a violation of the rules at least 3 times and has been told by admin and a mod that it's not a rules violation. Based on flags post and the responses by Ibobi and JW, it looks like they didn't read through his post or didn't understand it.
On a separate issue, if it's okay for somebody who is permabanned to come back under an alias or new name, then why have rules or permaban anybody. That would make this a free for all in the forums but maybe that's what HuntingNet is going for? I'm not trying to create a stink or problem but I can see why flags is getting a bit exasperated.
On a separate issue, if it's okay for somebody who is permabanned to come back under an alias or new name, then why have rules or permaban anybody. That would make this a free for all in the forums but maybe that's what HuntingNet is going for? I'm not trying to create a stink or problem but I can see why flags is getting a bit exasperated.
- It is not legal to come back under a new name; nobody said it was
- Yes it is a permabannable offense to do so if your ban was temporary (circumstances can sometimes affect this)
- Nobody misread flags' posts. He keeps saying the member in question is someone who's been banned before, coming back to post under an alias, yet there is no evidence of this. The posts in question don't violate the rules. What would you do?
07-20-2018, 09:56 AM
#26
Typical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 557
Nope, not him. It is the guy posting a 6CreedMoor. He has been banned more than 100 times and keeps coming back with a new name. In a few weeks if the MODs don't take action he will begin with serious insults and then the racism will start. that is the way he does business and that is why CAL always shut him down. Mark my words that guy's intent is to disrupt the forum because he has been trying to do it for a couple of years.
07-20-2018, 01:03 PM
#27
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in Vermont
Posts: 22,589
Between CalHunter and I, we banned the member flags is talking about well over 100 times. His violation was coming back under an alias when he had already been permabanned. His intent was to flagrantly violate the rules. We banned him as soon as we figured out who he was using the mod tools to look a bit further into some things regular members can't see or when due to his repeated postings other members like flags gave us a heads up causing us to look a little deeper. CalHunter is the master at uncovering people who are trying to deceive the site. Just saying........
Last edited by Champlain Islander; 07-20-2018 at 01:06 PM.
07-20-2018, 01:57 PM
#29
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,693
Well, you're wrong on pretty much all your points here, sorry to point out.
- It is not legal to come back under a new name; nobody said it was
- Yes it is a permabannable offense to do so if your ban was temporary (circumstances can sometimes affect this)
- Nobody misread flags' posts. He keeps saying the member in question is someone who's been banned before, coming back to post under an alias, yet there is no evidence of this. The posts in question don't violate the rules. What would you do?
07-20-2018, 02:11 PM
#30
Typical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 557
Ok. If you say I'm wrong. But out of curiosity, you mentioned a different member named Bigbuck in your original comment and flags has now clarified said he was talking about 6CreedMoor. Since your original comment was based upon looking at the history or whatever of Bigbuck, there shouldn't have been any "evidence." The question now would be is there any evidence with regard to "6Creedmoor" who flags has now identified and now Champlain Islander has confirmed that he was previously permabanned over "100 times." I know Champlain islander used to be a moderator so would assume he is in a position to know about these previous permabans. You posted that flags should let you know when this 6creedmoor has posted something that violates the rules. According to your above quote directed at me, if 6CreedMoor has previously been permabanned under another name, that would constitute a rules violation and subsequent permaban. Or do you see this differently?
