HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Scopes and Sights (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/scopes-sights-114/)
-   -   Base/Rings? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/scopes-sights/379169-base-rings.html)

emtrescue6 02-20-2013 03:50 PM

My answer is still the same....Warne and Millet....followed by Luppy's. Have Luppy's on my 7mm Rem Mag, Warne's on several rifles and a 270 WSM...and Millet's on my 300WM and 270 WIN. All have performed very well, but Warne's and Millet's take the slight lead IMO.

Rob in VT 02-20-2013 05:16 PM

For a 50mm objective would I need high or extra high Warne rings?

OpticsCamp 02-21-2013 04:52 AM


Originally Posted by Rob in VT (Post 4037668)
For a 50mm objective would I need high or extra high Warne rings?

High should be fine. Double check the Warne ring chart:
http://opticscamp.com/pdfs/warne-scope-ring-chart.pdf

Not sure if it helps in this case, but here's a quick and dirty guide on how to determine ring height:
http://opticscamp.com/content/9-meas...pe-ring-height

emtrescue6 02-21-2013 03:35 PM

It might also depend on the bases you use...my Savage Model 10 FLCP-K has a Swift 6-24x50AO on it with an EGW one-piece "rail" base and I needed to use Medium Warner rings...where as with a Nikon 3-9x50 on my Remington 700 BDL using Warne 2 piece bases I needed Warner High Rings...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.