HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Scopes and Sights (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/scopes-sights-114/)
-   -   Nikon Buckmaster (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/scopes-sights/337458-nikon-buckmaster.html)

cuda67 01-01-2011 11:24 AM

Nikon Buckmaster
 
Is the Nikon Buckmaster a good scope for the money? I was looking at putting it on my Winchester model 70 .270

flips2 01-01-2011 11:46 AM

I have two of them and love them. I think they are great scopes for the money.

jerry d 01-01-2011 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by flips2 (Post 3751008)
I have two of them and love them. I think they are great scopes for the money.

I have one on my 243 a 3-9x40 I like it but I haven't put it thru the mill yet. Some guys on this site say they cant take a beating the way Leupold can

Big Uncle 01-02-2011 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by jerry d (Post 3751013)
Some guys on this site say they cant take a beating the way Leupold can

Maybe not, but they are still good scopes and a good value in their price range.

flips2 01-02-2011 11:15 AM


Originally Posted by jerry d (Post 3751013)
I have one on my 243 a 3-9x40 I like it but I haven't put it thru the mill yet. Some guys on this site say they cant take a beating the way Leupold can

I put one on my everyday deer rifle, Rem. 700 .270WSM four years ago and it has always been zeroed in every year. This is after riding around in the truck or on the atv. So I have never had a problem with it taking a "beating". Not that I am slamming my gun down or anything but from the normal bangs it may take, the scope has been great.

the jigger 01-03-2011 11:10 AM

Nikon?
 
You are asking for opinions. IMHO Nikon, across all models in their line, gives you the most for the dollar spent. Am I saying they are the "BEST"? NO!I am saying "for your money they give you the best VALUE.
I have eight Nikons across all models and have never had a failure.
I have one Monarch that is over 10 years old and is as clear as the day I mounted it.
I have two Buckmasters on varmint rifles and both have been adjustment repeatable every time I have turned the turrets.
GOOD LUCK and GOOD SHOOTING!!!

cuda67 01-05-2011 01:39 PM

Is there another brand for about the same money that would be good or better than the Buckmaster?

stapher1 01-05-2011 02:46 PM


Originally Posted by cuda67 (Post 3753251)
Is there another brand for about the same money that would be good or better than the Buckmaster?

I would look at weaver or sightron, i've had no luck with my nikon's. But if it was my money i'd buy a leupold, almost the same money and zero trouble.

onetohunt 01-05-2011 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by cuda67 (Post 3753251)
Is there another brand for about the same money that would be good or better than the Buckmaster?

I would look at the Vortex Diamondback. It is a very good scope for the money.

cuda67 01-06-2011 01:42 PM

What is the difference between the Nikon Buckmaster and the Prostaff? What model of Leupolds are good?

jdhogg 01-07-2011 06:14 AM

i have a vortex diamondback 4-12x40 on my 22-250 and its solid.i really like the clarity and sharpness and for 189.00 and a great warrenty its hard for me to beat

cuda67 01-07-2011 06:50 AM

That's not a bad price.

MasterBlaster 01-25-2011 11:15 AM

I have the following Buckmasters scopes:
3-9x40 on my 223(was on the 270)
4.5-14x40 mildot on the 270
6-18x40 mildot on my 308 (turrets are very repeatable and always go back to the exact place after long range adjustments)
and a prostaff 3-9x40 BDC on my 50 cal muzzle loader.

I shoot a lot!!! Ive never had one lose zero, never had ANY type of problem out any of them like i had in the past with some crappy Tasco and simmons scopes.

When I compared them to other scopes in the same price range they always looked sharper and brighter. Plus they have a lifetime warranty.

To me Nikon is the best bang for your buck. Sure they are better scopes but I dont think they are enough better to justify the 2x-4x price of the nikon.

Fla.Swamper 02-19-2011 08:45 PM

I had a 4.5-14(the old style, no side focus) on my 7mmwsm model 70....great set up!! compared to Leupold....better than the VXII...VXIII is much better, but way more costly. In my opinion, the Buckmaster is a great scope for the money, mine took a beating in the freezing cold of the Virginia mountains to the stupid heat of central Florida.....never lost zero, never anything but clear. If you're on a mid-range budget, I don't think you can go wrong.

fritz1 02-20-2011 04:11 AM


Originally Posted by cuda67 (Post 3753729)
What is the difference between the Nikon Buckmaster and the Prostaff? What model of Leupolds are good?

Any model of Leupold, VXI, VXII, VXIII, and VX7, except for the Rifleman, stay away from that POS! Its hard to believe Leupold actually put there name on that one. The new Redfields also looks really good for the money, one of my buddies just bought a 4-12x40mm Redfield, it is amazingly clear, and a good looking scope. He paid like $200, very good deal in my opinion, hard to beat for a affordable hunting scope. Plus it is made in America by Leupold, and it carries the same great warranty as the other Leupold scopes.

GRIZZLYMAN 02-21-2011 11:53 AM

I had a 3-9X 40mm Buckmaster on my old 7mm RM BAR and got good service out of it. I'm curious about the new Redfield line. I looked through the new Redfield binos (10X42) and they were really clear.

IAhuntr 02-21-2011 12:59 PM

I see this thread is a bit old, but in case the OP hasn't bought yet I'll add that the newer (2005+) Buckmasters scopes are a very nice scope for the money. I have one on a 30-06 and am very pleased.
But if you search around, you can get a Bushnell Elite 4200 on sale now for $199 plus another $20 off with a coupon at one of the larger hunting retailers. You can't find anything close to the quality of the 4200 at that price point.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.