![]() |
6.5X55 and 260 remington
My reloading books are old, could someone tell me if the 6.5 mm bullet can be use to load the Remington 260 or is the 6.5mm bigger.
|
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: 270BBR My reloading books are old, could someone tell me if the 6.5 mm bullet can be use to load the Remington 260 or is the 6.5mm bigger. |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
Thanks;)
|
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: 270BBR My reloading books are old, could someone tell me if the 6.5 mm bullet can be use to load the Remington 260 or is the 6.5mm bigger. 270BR...To convert MM to CAL.>multiply MM by .040 To convert CAL. to MM> Divide by .040 |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
To convert MM to CAL.>multiply MM by .040 To convert CAL. to MM> Divide by .040 Then it gets worse.....for example a 7MM bullet should be 7 X .03937 = .27559 and a real 7MM bullet is .284 Another example.....a 6MM bullet should be 6 X .03937=.23622 and it's really .243 I believe this is from the European bore diameter for the rifle bore prior to rifling.....not actual bullet diameter. |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: Vapodog To convert MM to CAL.>multiply MM by .040 To convert CAL. to MM> Divide by .040 Then it gets worse.....for example a 7MM bullet should be 7 X .03937 = .27559 and a real 7MM bullet is .284 Another example.....a 6MM bullet should be 6 X .03937=.23622 and it's really .243 I believe this is from the European bore diameter for the rifle bore prior to rifling.....not actual bullet diameter. The 9 is over 5 so makes the 3 a 4 The 7 is over 5 so makes the 3 a 4 If you multiply 7mm x .040> .280 cal If you divide .280 by .040> 7mm I was stateing CALIBUR not DIAMETER.... Actually your figure would be .044... |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: Rebel Hog ORIGINAL: Vapodog To convert MM to CAL.>multiply MM by .040 To convert CAL. to MM> Divide by .040 Then it gets worse.....for example a 7MM bullet should be 7 X .03937 = .27559 and a real 7MM bullet is .284 Another example.....a 6MM bullet should be 6 X .03937=.23622 and it's really .243 I believe this is from the European bore diameter for the rifle bore prior to rifling.....not actual bullet diameter. The 9 is over 5 so makes the 3 a 4 The 7 is over 5 so makes the 3 a 4 If you multiply 7mm x .040> .280 cal If you divide .280 cal by .040> 7mm My statement was CALIBUR not DIAMETER.... Actually your figure would be .044................ .044 the 4 is under 5, so drop the 4>>.040 6.5mm x .040>>.260 |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
So what does 7.62mm convert to?:D
|
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
Briman,
I am not quoting diameter, I am quoting Calibur. 8mm x .040> .32cal 7.62mm x .040> .31cal 7.5mm x .040> .30cal |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: Rebel Hog Briman, I am not quoting diameter, I am quoting Calibur. 8mm x .040> .32cal 7.62mm x .040> .31cal .30cal / .040> 7.5mm .243cal / .040> 6mm 6mm x .040> .24cal |
RE: 6.5X55 and 260 remington
ORIGINAL: Vapodog To convert MM to CAL.>multiply MM by .040 To convert CAL. to MM> Divide by .040 Then it gets worse.....for example a 7MM bullet should be 7 X .03937 = .27559 and a real 7MM bullet is .284 Another example.....a 6MM bullet should be 6 X .03937=.23622 and it's really .243 I believe this is from the European bore diameter for the rifle bore prior to rifling.....not actual bullet diameter. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.