|
How are Sierra bullets
I have been loading Nosler partitions for my .300RSAUM with no qualms at all, but for economical and financial reasons I am thinking of switching to sierra, probably the Pro-hunters for this round. How will these bullets hold up in that caliber? I want an economical bullet, yet if they won't perform and be accurate then Im not going to waste my money on them. I loaded some Game-Kings in my .260 rem last year and got good results, but not sure how they would do with the .300 short ultra mag.Also, is the only difference between the Game King and Pro Hunter the flat base of the Pro Hunter? thanks.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
I have used the Sierra 175 grain Spitzerpro hunterin my 8mm-06 for years and have been very pleased with them. Accuracy is superb and I have never had any issues holding a deer with them.
According to Sierra, the gamekings are generally designed to be used as a long range bullet while the pro hunter is generally used at more moderate ranges. Honestly, I believe Nosler, Sierra, and Hornady all make fine good quality bullets. |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
Don't be afraid of using 190SMK. The book says SMK's are target only but they will give you good results on game and accuracy is 2nd to none.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
Would not hesitate going with sptizers.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
I wouldn't hesitate to use a 165 or 180 ProHunter out of the Saum. I've found the PH to be a bit tougher than the GameKing . . . .but I don't think the difference would be even worth noting if deer sized critters are your quary.
I will say the Sierra's have been one of the most accurate bullets in many of my rigs... Brett |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
The Sierra Gamekings in 165gr .308 caliber worked great for me last year. They shot nice in everything that I tried it in, from 30-30 (either loaded one at a time or in a clip) to 30.06 and 308 Winchester. They loaded easily too being a boattail design.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
ORIGINAL: gunnermhr Don't be afraid of using 190SMK. The book says SMK's are target only but they will give you good results on game and accuracy is 2nd to none. |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
ORIGINAL: country1 The Match King is not a hunting bullet, and that is why Sierra has posted that it is not to be used for hunting. If a Match King bullet hits bone (especially heavy bone), it is known to break up and not provide a clean kill. This is a 240 Grain SMK out of a 30-378 on a ground hog at 300 yards. I think they work just fine  |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
A groundhog is not a deer sized game. A groundhog does not havemuch of abone structure. If the bullet breaks up on a groundhogso what. A fragmenting 240 grainbullet will do a fine job on a groundhog. Sierra says you can use its Match King in .308 diamter bullets for prairie dogs, etc. There is a reason why Sierra says the Match Kingnot to be used on deer sized or larger game.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
I never killed a deer with one either ;). Unless you have used one on a deer size animal you shouldn't give it bad reviews. You hit a deer with a 240 grain SMK it WILL NOT GO ANYWHERE. I HAVE DONE IT! Same can be said for the 190 SMK it just doesn't have as much energy. Long range hunters use them because they are very accurate and very effective. I know a bunch of guys that hunt Elk at distances up to 1300 yards and the SMK is the bullet of choice for them.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
Actually I did load up some 168gr match king out of my 30-06 several years ago. Shot one whitetail with them. The bullet entered just behind the shoulder and blew up inside the chest cavity. The buck didnt run but 30 yards and fell over. However, they are not made for hunting and that proves it. I use 165gr hpbt game kings now.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
ORIGINAL: Kbeaner I have been loading Nosler partitions for my .300RSAUM with no qualms at all, but for economical and financial reasons I am thinking of switching to sierra, probably the Pro-hunters for this round. How will these bullets hold up in that caliber? I want an economical bullet, yet if they won't perform and be accurate then Im not going to waste my money on them. I loaded some Game-Kings in my .260 rem last year and got good results, but not sure how they would do with the .300 short ultra mag.Also, is the only difference between the Game King and Pro Hunter the flat base of the Pro Hunter? thanks. |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
ORIGINAL: country1 ORIGINAL: gunnermhr Don't be afraid of using 190SMK. The book says SMK's are target only but they will give you good results on game and accuracy is 2nd to none. |
RE: How are Sierra bullets
This thread had got me thinking. I would not use matchkings for hunting. I see some do on extremeaccuracy and other long range hunting pages. But if your firing a 200-220gr piece of lead thinly coated like a mk, then I can't see why they wouldn't work. Like I said, I haven't done it and really don't plan on it. But thats a huge chunk of lead at work there.
|
RE: How are Sierra bullets
I was gave about 250 of the 200 gr Matchkings. I was thinking loaded to about 21-2300 fps they'd have to be excellent on short range woods deer. The quickest I have ever had deer drt was using the 180 rn Winchesters out of a 742 which were probably 2400 tops.
|
Sierra 165gr BTHP
Used the Sierra 165 Gameking BTHP in the 308 Win and 30-06 as well as the 300 Win and 300 WSM.
Very good tough bullet ........ |
RE: Sierra 165gr BTHP
ORIGINAL: Alaska338 Used the Sierra 165 Gameking BTHP in the 308 Win and 30-06 as well as the 300 Win and 300 WSM. Very good tough bullet ........ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.