Hornady v. Barnes
Question: (These are for a .50 cal.)
Which do you prefer and why: Hornady 250gr SST Barnes 245 gr Spit-Fire MZ Barnes 250 gr Spit-Fire TMZ OR If you prefer Barnes, do you like the 285 or 290 gr bullets better? Thanks! |
RE: Hornady v. Barnes
I haveused Hornady 250 SST's since 1997 and have never had a problem with them. I can not comment on the Barnes, never used them.
|
RE: Hornady v. Barnes
SST
|
RE: Hornady v. Barnes
I have used the 250 gr. Barnes with very good results. They create a big wound channel and really dump animals hard. They also seat very hard in my T/C guns. I would recommend changing sabots to the Harvester with this bullet.
Have also used the 250 gr. Shockwave, which is the same bullet as SST with a slightlyeasier seatingsabot. These have also been very good - great balance of penetration and expansion. And they fly very well at long range. Maybe see which ones shoot the best on your rifle. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.