![]() |
RE: The theory behind the 6.8mm Remington SPC
Why didn't they just convert them to the .308 Win?? If the SPC needs a new barrel and bolt, why not just throw a new mag in there and use a real round. I also think the .223 is doing the job most of the time, its just like deer hunting, bullet placement is key.
|
RE: The theory behind the 6.8mm Remington SPC
ORIGINAL: jeepkid Why didn't they just convert them to the .308 Win?? If the SPC needs a new barrel and bolt, why not just throw a new mag in there and use a real round. I also think the .223 is doing the job most of the time, its just like deer hunting, bullet placement is key. |
RE: The theory behind the 6.8mm Remington SPC
Yeah I knew about the AR-10, but I didn't know that they had to change that many other parts. Oh well I thought I had a good idea.
|
RE: The theory behind the 6.8mm Remington SPC
I believe the 2800 FPS MV given for the 6.8 may bewith a sporting-length, like 22" or even 24", barrel, NOT the short one on the military rifles. The figure of 2625 FPS sounds more realistic for the military weapons.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.