HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Reloading (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/reloading-15/)
-   -   .300 WSM (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/reloading/14132-300-wsm.html)

3DNWV 10-28-2002 11:48 AM

.300 WSM
 
Im looking for a good load for my new .300 WSM model 70 featherweight
I like 165 ballistic tips. anybody worked a load up witht hese bullets yet??
Thanks

3DNWV

oldelkhunter 10-28-2002 12:20 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Nope haven't touched the 165 grain loads. Nosler #5 should have the loads in there and if I remember I have a lot of load data on this cartridge and will reply to this tomorrow. I have been messing around with the 180 partitions...65.0 grains of H4350-Federal 215 primer set at 2.860 OAL and I get 2940-2960 in a 23" barrelled A bolt

oldelkhunter 10-29-2002 09:41 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Ok 65.5 Of H4350 with a 165 partition will get you about 3100 fps..same OAL as my previous post along with same brass and primer

3DNWV 10-29-2002 09:55 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Thanks for the info that will bet my 30-06 with same bullet at least 300fps

3DNWV

oldelkhunter 10-29-2002 11:15 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
I have been getting 3290+ with 150 grain winchester silvertip ammo . On your gun back off that load number and work up to it watching for pressure signs and you should be fine. I have had very good success using Hogdon H4350. Because I was loading for an A bolt the OAL was 2.860 for your Winchester you can seat them out they like about .020 off the lands with partitions.

Clearcut 11-10-2002 09:39 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
oldelkhunter >>> what size group does your rifle shoot at 100yds with the 165gr partition bullet, and 65.5grs H4350 ???


oldelkhunter 11-11-2002 09:11 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Have not shot the 165 partition yet..person that shot it said .75 he is using a 300 wsm winchester SS that has been modified...trigger done and freefloated...I have been getting .75 with factory ballistic tip ammo and less than 1/2(believe it or not) one ragged hole with 65.0 H4350 ...180 grain partition ..Fed 215 primer and OAL set to 2.860. This happened again yesterday and I chronographed the load this time at 2925-2950 . This is a browning A bolt Stainless Stalker that with exception of a trigger job is untouched and has had about 150 rounds fired thru it.

seattlesetters 11-11-2002 05:29 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Might the .300 WSM be light-recoiling enough to let me get into a larger magnum caliber without doing further damage to my already-tender shoulder?

Remember, I can handle the kick of either the 7mm Rem Mag or the .270 Wby Mag, which I find to be about equal. How does the recoil of the .300 WSM compare to these two?

Good Dogwork and Good Hunting

oldelkhunter 11-12-2002 07:00 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Seattle--with your shoulder I would stick to the 270 wsm...if you look up Winchesters website and based solely on factory ammo . Compare a 130 ballistic tip with a 140 ballistic tip out of a 7 stw and look at the 400 yard drop. Now the long mags published velocities are taken with a 26" barrel and the short mags with a 24" barrel. Then tell me what you would rather carry around with you. Your talking a gun that weighs 2 lbs less is very accurate and extremely flat shooting and is manageable for you recoil wise. I am basing it on the fact that a 270 win mag is a gentle recoiling rifle and the powder capacity on the 270 wsm is not that much greater and the case is more efficient. I am waiting for Ruger to come out with one of these.

Deleted User 11-12-2002 09:43 AM

[Deleted]
 
[Deleted by Admins]

3DNWV 11-12-2002 09:49 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
I took my new 300WSM to the range this weekend to work on groups now that Ive had trigger worked on. 1" at 100 with factory winchester 180gr power points. The gun is model 70 feather weight with decelalator recoil pad it has some kick to it shooting off the bench. I plan to try the 180 and 165 gr ballistic tip and partition loads this week end Ill let you know how they do.

3DNWV

3DNWV 11-12-2002 09:49 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
I took my new 300WSM to the range this weekend to work on groups now that Ive had trigger worked on. 1" at 100 with factory winchester 180gr power points. The gun is model 70 feather weight with decelalator recoil pad it has some kick to it shooting off the bench. I plan to try the 180 and 165 gr ballistic tip and partition loads this week end Ill let you know how they do.

3DNWV

oldelkhunter 11-12-2002 01:41 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
DG--I have had the model 70 for a year and 1/2 and the Abolt since last fall...I have nothing but praise for them with exception of the actions , they are both accurate and not finnicky about loads, one require more work than the other(mod70) to shoot well but it is doing very well now the A-bolt out of the box is the most accurate rifle I have ever owned. I find that I don't like the action on either one much ...A bolt is not as smooth as I thought it would be and likewise for the Model 70(SS). Handloading my 700 classic in 300 win mag..the action is smoother much smoother and the shells seem to feed better...velocity wise I am using Max loads from the Nosler # 4 manual and it the 300 win mag is about 100 fps light in that department...using handloads in the 300 wsm I am getting 2925-2960 with 65.0 H4350 and FED215 primer which is below the published velocities in the Nosler manual. The Classic is a nice pointing rifle and the abolt and the m70 are also. I prefer a long action and a bit heavier gun though so I am thinking down the road I would like to get a carbon steel Model 70 action or a likewise 700 short action and get it rebarreled with a 24" barrel and fit into a mcmillan stock to get at 7 1/2 lb range, the reason for carbon steel over 416 is I believe it is slicker.If i change my mind I will go with a factory ruger 77. So far all the factory ammo I have used has been right at specs and even exceeded in some cases with both rifles and one has a 23 and the other 24 inch barrel, worst accuracy has been with the powerpoints(180) . Felt recoil is less than experienced with the classic but it has comparable if not more muzzle blast. Your right about the Hoopla the dealers around here cannot keep them in stock either of the calibers and the 2 custom gun builders I talked to are swamped and building lots of them. The ammo and brass is very easy to find.

3DNWV 11-13-2002 07:35 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Oldelkhunter what type groups were you getting wtih the power points and what groups were you getting with the H4350 with 180s and 165s??I didnt run my shots through my chrono yet. I picked you more 165 aballistic tips abd some 180 partitions but shop didnt have any H4350 so have towork those loads when it comes in what about trying with IMR 4350??

3DNWV

oldelkhunter 11-13-2002 11:04 AM

RE: .300 WSM
 
3dnwv I was getting about 1" groups from the powerpoints which I used exclusively for the first 2-3 boxes of ammo shot from the abolt during breakin. Handloads were less than an 1/2 " One ragged hole with the 180 partitions...I have like I said before ever shot 165's out of that gun. I have a friend in Alabama that pretty much specializes on building SWAT rifles and as a matter of fact does them for a certain city in Alabama. He pretty much uses Remington actions Krieger,Schneider or Hart barrels are used per him. He built 2 Remington custom rifles in 300 wsm for 2 local hunters. He told me they would shoot small ragged groups with them and were ecstatic about the performance.

s4bill 11-13-2002 12:13 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Does this mean if I am looking to buy a Ruger 77 Mark II......I should make the .300 wsm my first rifle?

seattlesetters 11-13-2002 12:50 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Does this mean if I am looking to buy a Ruger 77 Mark II......I should make the .300 wsm my first rifle?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>

Any .300 Mag is a lot of gun for a first rifle. Perhaps a standard caliber with less recoil would be a little easier to learn with.

Good Dogwork and Good Hunting

s4bill 11-13-2002 01:10 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
Would a .280 be a better choice as far as recoil?

seattlesetters 11-13-2002 02:12 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Would a .280 be a better choice as far as recoil?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>

IMHO, a .280 Rem would make a far better choice as a first deer rifle. You can also hunt just about everything else in North America (except brown bears and bison) with a .280, and it will do the job just fine.

Good Dogwork and Good Hunting

3DNWV 11-20-2002 08:22 PM

RE: .300 WSM
 
The weather was good today so got to try my 165 ballistic tip load out did grea1st 2 shots nice tight figure 8 3rd steped out ended up about 5/8 inch group. the load was 64.gr H4350 fed 215 primer 165 BT win brass 2.86 OAL thanks again elk hunter.

3DNWV


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.