well Libtards!
07-18-2021, 06:33 AM
#21
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,236
Originally Posted by hubby11
Absolute cop-out. Speaking for myself, I am not even asking for a source of the meme, just the name of the search engine that is claimed to be less biased than Google. If it exists, it should be easy to provide.
07-18-2021, 07:27 AM
#23
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: fla
Posts: 1,123
07-18-2021, 12:54 PM
#24
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
Here is the election discrepancies that you have fought to keep buried!
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
07-19-2021, 04:36 PM
#25
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,236
Originally Posted by lonestar50
74,243
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
07-19-2021, 04:50 PM
#26
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,717
Originally Posted by lonestar50
74,243
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
Did you see the email which has been released where election officials stated only ballpoint pens to be used on ballots during early voting and then sharpies the day of? Is it a real email from the election supervisor? I don’t know but it’s another question.
07-21-2021, 02:06 AM
#28
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,717
Originally Posted by lonestar50
74,243
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
Logan claimed, for instance, that “we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent” to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number Logan cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were in dispute.
11,326
Logan also claimed with an almost sheepish, gotcha grin that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. “I cannot think of a logical explanation of why that would be,” he declared.Steal proven!
Except—no. There was a logical explanation that Archer tweeted out, almost immediately: The voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.
“This is common with…every…county…in…Arizona and has been since the data became available over a decade ago,” Archer wrote.
07-21-2021, 06:38 AM
#29
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: West by god Virginia
Posts: 943
Just sad to think once all this is proven , if in fact it is , nothing will be done , I don’t have enough trust or faith in our legal system , or other government folks to believe anything will be done , I hope to god I’m wrong.
07-24-2021, 09:14 AM
#30
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,717
Can one of the liberals who have been defending the election results and attacking the audit currently going on please explain why there were almost 40k queries into the election system on Feb 5 and all date is missing going back to November 3rd? Could this be the reason they refuse to turn over subpoenaed items like the routers and logs? People with nothing to hide don’t defy subpoenas.
