hardcastonly

http://www.grumpysperformance.com/ma...tifathreat.png


watch the video closely
ANTIFA thinks they can force the USA population into accepting unconditionally,
the SOCIALIST POLICE STATE THEY DESIRE,
by starting shooting any conservatives,
if they don,t get ,Biden proclaimed as the uncontested election winner
ADMITEDLY due to FRAUD
if TRUMP refuses to conceded
I don,t see most of rural AMERICA reacting well,
by meekly, knuckling under to threats made by armed left-wing radical domestic terrorists

Oldtimr

Let them bring it, some of them will be done doing anything.

lonestar50

OK this is so obviously fake. All it takes is a quick google search to discover this antifa "leader" who posted this is nothing more than an internet troll who posts outrageous claims all for the goal of getting a rise out of you right wing conservatives. And there are always people to fall for it. I try to always to double check things like this that seem so far fetched as to be almost unbelievable.

I think what this guy is doing is stupid and irresponsible, since it could lead to some unhinged person on either side to do something stupid. Please stop posting anything you find on the internet as real news.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...l/?arc404=true

Alsatian

I heard one person say (1) the other side is unable to figure out what bathroom to use and (2) our side has s*** tons of ammo and guns. Who do YOU think is going to prevail in a contest of force? Probably just BS urban legend crap, but bring it and let's see who knuckles under and surrenders their neck to the yoke of submission.

lonestar50

No. Let's not "Bring it" nobody should want a contest of force. I don't know maybe you do. You are reacting exactly how that guy wants you to. He's probably sitting on his couch have a good laugh about it

Alsatian

Maybe it's fake. Maybe it's not fake. What there can be NO mistake is that, categorically, BLM and Antifa are seeking their political ends through violence and intimidation. That will NOT end should Joe Biden arrive in the white house nor if Trump stays there. I have studied a great deal of history, and it is overwhelmingly apparent that appeasement and capitulation to force leads to use of higher levels of force . . . until it is repulsed with force. I am not making a statement of petulant bravado, just a statement of realpolitik grounded in extensive study. Maybe I'll be wrong. Maybe BLM and Antifa WILL put down their violent methods. But the way I see it, they believe their violence has achieved significant victories and hence will push even harder. In the context of continued appeasement by civil authorities, a violent confrontation with ordinary citizens is inevitable.

Or how do you see things going, Lonestar50? Are BLM and Antifa going to sprout haloes and give up violence?

Ridge Runner

They are strong-arms of the democrat party, www.antifa.com , then follow the money to BLM, go to their website and try to donate, it goes directly to act blue, the main charitable contributor to the dems. they want war? back down is not in my vocabulary, yeah, bring it!
RR

WV 67

LOL. Let em try it in West by God Virginia LOL. By the time my dog get done with em I’d just laugh and pick up the pieces , they don’t want none , ....I’m sure it’s fake or just a bluff do what they will in a Dem states in the hills and rural America it won’t fly but would be a good way to get free guns LOL

hardcastonly

DeSantis proposing 'anti-mob' legislation to expand Florida's 'stand your ground' law

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/pol...247094007.html

Gov. DeSantis wants 'Stand Your Ground' expanded

Florida's DeSantis moves to allow citizens to shoot looters, rioters targeting businesses
this legal right to self-defense,
would only be applied to people obviously under the immediate obvious threat,
and on the property, they had every reason to defend

make it legal to shoot looters and arsonists targeting your business
if you work your whole life to build a neighborhood business,
and some criminal retarded social scum,
decides to loot your inventory or burn it to the ground,
because of something you had zero to do with,
looters and arsonists, in the act of looting or arson,
should be able to be shot on the spot by,
police or the property owner or business personal defending the business,
in defense of your life's work,
and property, legally with zero questions, and no questions asked or legal recourse by looters and arsons families



not just your home..
AN EXCELLENT IDEA IN MY OPINION
the liberals are sure to have a complete melt down & **** fit
over that suggestion
yes it inevitably leads to more home invaders, burglars and carjackers being shot
, I think most of us can live with that little issue raising the gun shot statistics

elkman30

I don't know about shooting looters at a business but I think a person should be able to shoot rioters assaulting them. It's too easy for a person to end up dead or seriously injured in such an uncontrolled assault.

@lonestar50. Yes, that guy is obviously a troll but it isn't just his actions alone. Look at all of the other similar minded people who post support or agreement and you can see that he's not just seeking to stir up "right wing conservatives" or push back against them by inflaming them. He's also seeking to stir up far left into taking inappropriate action by inflaming them. Th fact that he's a Bernie supporter is not surprising. Many of those Bernie bros are far left activists who are also violent.

and of course, isn't it surprising that facebook's algorithms can't figure out that this guy is stirring up violence and should be banned? No, of course not. That's what zuckerburg and his group of misfits want. Violence, social unrest, partisan divide.

You post about how we're getting trolled and you don't want conservatives or right wingers(a stupid term) to react to crap like this. But where are your attempts to prevent this, condemn it or shut it down? Oh yeah, there are none. Instead, you just want to tell all of us that we're being chumps for reacting to crap like this. You apparently had trouble distinguishing between the members on this forum who condemned such a stupid trolling attempt by stating the obvious (it wouldn't work if they tried it) and the far right activists who fell for the trolling and showed up on site. When you chastised those who responded verbally about the stupidity of the troll, you walked right into one of that troll's secondary goals. Generating disdain for those on the right.