Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
In case anyone is stupid enough to believe the circus is a prelude to impeachment >

In case anyone is stupid enough to believe the circus is a prelude to impeachment

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

In case anyone is stupid enough to believe the circus is a prelude to impeachment

Reply

Old 11-05-2019, 05:39 PM
  #101  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 724
Default

Woohoo!! Post # 100. Now back to the subject. What Cub Slayer said.
elkman30 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2019, 06:19 PM
  #102  
Super Moderator
 
Bocajnala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Trumbull County, Ohio
Posts: 7,384
Default

I'll play along elkman. Checking in #101.

Half my posts weren't saying much anyway! That's how I got to 7,000+

-Jake
Bocajnala is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 11:27 AM
  #103  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 870
Default

Originally Posted by Cub Slayer View Post
How does it sound? It sounds like the forest floor deposits hunters use to identify what deer have been eating. The only concrete evidence is a transcript that indicates completely legal activity. If that's all you have, Trump is very safe.
You must be talking about the "redacted" transcript --- The full version of D.J. Trump's transcript "quid pro quo" call to the Ukrainian president, is still under lock an key; stored in a ultra-top secret web server for the president.

Will somebody please tell radio talk show host - Rush Limbaugh that this is so --- But I doubt you'll be able too...because the radio screeners for Rush would never let a caller on for making such a bold and truthful statement.
Erno86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 12:03 PM
  #104  
Dominant Buck
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vermont
Posts: 20,495
Default

One thing about Rush he is on the right hand side in all cases. Personally I get kind of sick of listening to his one sided agenda and find his show boring.
Champlain Islander is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 12:09 PM
  #105  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Erno86 View Post
You must be talking about the "redacted" transcript --- The full version of D.J. Trump's transcript "quid pro quo" call to the Ukrainian president, is still under lock an key; stored in a ultra-top secret web server for the president.

Will somebody please tell radio talk show host - Rush Limbaugh that this is so --- But I doubt you'll be able too...because the radio screeners for Rush would never let a caller on for making such a bold and truthful statement.
Since the "redacted transcript" as you call it (it is NOT "redacted", BTW, please learn what "redacted" means) is the only one you could have seen, I thought it was a safe assumption that you were referring to that one. Otherwise your statement which you represented as fact is nothing but complete guesswork on your part.

I can't comment on the contents of a transcript I haven't seen, but that doesn't seem to be stopping you.
Cub Slayer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 12:13 PM
  #106  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Champlain Islander View Post
One thing about Rush he is on the right hand side in all cases. Personally I get kind of sick of listening to his one sided agenda and find his show boring.
Rush Limbaugh's show is unlistenable. Even if you're interested in the topic (rare), and agree with him (even more rare), he beats everything to death.

Rush has an uncanny ability to condense a 10-minute idea down to 2 hours.
Cub Slayer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 12:18 PM
  #107  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 11,819
Default

Originally Posted by Cub Slayer View Post
Since the "redacted transcript" as you call it (it is NOT "redacted", BTW, please learn what "redacted" means) is the only one you could have seen, I thought it was a safe assumption that you were referring to that one. Otherwise your statement which you represented as fact is nothing but complete guesswork on your part.

I can't comment on the contents of a transcript I haven't seen, but that doesn't seem to be stopping you.
The lack of knowledge about anything doesn't stop him from telling you how much he knows, which of course s absolutely nothing, , zip, zero, nada!
Oldtimr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2019, 02:15 PM
  #108  
Nontypical Buck
 
C. Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kountze, Texas
Posts: 4,487
Default

Originally Posted by Erno86 View Post
You must be talking about the "redacted" transcript --- The full version of D.J. Trump's transcript "quid pro quo" call to the Ukrainian president, is still under lock an key; stored in a ultra-top secret web server for the president.

Will somebody please tell radio talk show host - Rush Limbaugh that this is so --- But I doubt you'll be able too...because the radio screeners for Rush would never let a caller on for making such a bold and truthful statement.
I thought you bought Schiff's version of the call.
How did Schiff get into Trump's super-duper secret server?
Ever thought Schiff might be lying to you like he has for the last 3 years?
Schiiff did say all during the Mueller fiasco that he had unequivocal evidence Trump colluded with Russia. Now Schiff is reduced to a benign phone call from a so called leftist hack who only got a second hand account of the call.
One of the few people countering the 3 year lie is Rush, he has been right from day one.

C. Davis

Last edited by C. Davis; 11-06-2019 at 02:17 PM.
C. Davis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 04:01 AM
  #109  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: fla
Posts: 709
Default



hardcastonly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 07:07 AM
  #110  
Nontypical Buck
 
Mickey Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,638
Default

Originally Posted by Cub Slayer View Post
Since the "redacted transcript" as you call it (it is NOT "redacted", BTW, please learn what "redacted" means) is the only one you could have seen, I thought it was a safe assumption that you were referring to that one. Otherwise your statement which you represented as fact is nothing but complete guesswork on your part.

I can't comment on the contents of a transcript I haven't seen, but that doesn't seem to be stopping you.
I think Erno meant to say edited. It's common for people to use redacted in place of edited. For information: when I redacted reports etc. Certain things where blacked out but the rest of the sentence remained. Editing is actually changing what is written.

Redacting is honest and editing is not IMHO
Mickey Finn is offline  
Reply With Quote

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service