Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
Multiple news outlets refused to report 2nd Kavanaugh accusation >

Multiple news outlets refused to report 2nd Kavanaugh accusation

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Multiple news outlets refused to report 2nd Kavanaugh accusation

Old 09-27-2018, 04:54 AM
  #11  
Giant Nontypical
 
flags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CO Born but working in Amarillo, TX for now.
Posts: 7,875
Default

Originally Posted by falcon View Post
Yeah, flags I've heard of all that stuff. Fact is that Kavanaugh could have prevented all this trash by passing a polygraph test. His first accuser passed her polygraph test. '

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/26/kava...deception.html

Yep, Kavanaugh has a judge Roy Moore problem.
Have you bothered doing any research on that so called polygraph test? From what I have seen they only asked 2 questions of a relevant nature and anyone that knows anything about polygraphs will tell you it takes at least 10 questions to get any sort of baseline data. Do you understand what that means? It means the test was pretty much garbage. Again, what part of HE DOES NOT NEED TO PROVE INNOCENCE do you fail to grasp?
flags is offline  
Old 09-27-2018, 05:04 AM
  #12  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 184
Default

Ford took a polygraph on August 7th in Maryland. (Did she fly?)
Her polygraph written statement contradicts her letter to Feinstein.
The polygraph was not given by any law enforcement but a third party.
The polygraph only consisted of two questions.
Those two questions were: “Is any part of your statement false?” and “Did you make up any part of your statement?”

Yep she’s Golden! LOL

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ford-polygraph-results-released-just-blow-huge-hole-story/
ATracker is online now  
Old 09-27-2018, 05:39 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,419
Default

Do you guys think the WHOLE accusation is made up.

Although Ford is a woman afterall?
NeverWill is offline  
Old 09-27-2018, 06:44 AM
  #14  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 817
Default

Originally Posted by falcon View Post
Yeah, flags I've heard of all that stuff. Fact is that Kavanaugh could have prevented all this trash by passing a polygraph test. His first accuser passed her polygraph test. '

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/26/kava...deception.html

Yep, Kavanaugh has a judge Roy Moore problem.
Somehow I don't think that would have stopped this circus.
elkman30 is offline  
Old 09-27-2018, 07:24 AM
  #15  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 817
Default

Originally Posted by ATracker View Post
Ford took a polygraph on August 7th in Maryland. (Did she fly?)
Her polygraph written statement contradicts her letter to Feinstein.
The polygraph was not given by any law enforcement but a third party.
The polygraph only consisted of two questions.
Those two questions were: “Is any part of your statement false?” and “Did you make up any part of your statement?”

Yep she’s Golden! LOL

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ford-polygraph-results-released-just-blow-huge-hole-story/
Even though the "written statement" the polygrapher used to prepare for his examination didn't mention Kavanaugh by name, his process of merely asking 2 questions is absolutely not how polygraph examinations are conducted. Anybody who has gone through such an examination as part of a background examination for a job, security clearance or has even done minimal reading on the subject would be well aware of that.
elkman30 is offline  
Old 09-27-2018, 07:57 AM
  #16  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 12,418
Default

The only reason they did that polgraph was so they could say she took one, they probably didn't know or care that there is a strict procedure.
Oldtimr is online now  
Old 09-27-2018, 09:42 AM
  #17  
RWK
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,149
Default

Originally Posted by flags View Post
You're not very bright are you? I can think of 3 reasons.

1) Polygraphs are not reliable.
2) Due to #1 they are not admissible as evidence.
3) He does not have to prove innocence. Ever heard of due process?

Get it?
I new a guys that took these test A NUMBER OF TIME AND PAST. hE WAS ONE OF THE BIGGEST LIARS EVER.
RWK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.