HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Politics (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/politics-16/)
-   -   It's on... (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/politics/418275-its.html)

Mickey Finn 06-10-2018 07:33 PM

It's on...
 
It's really on. The Trump/Kim summit is going to happen. They are camped 1/2 mile away from each other and it's a go! Trump says he'll know within one minute if rocket man is for real.

Christiano Lima from Politico has an article worth looking at to kind of set the stage.
http://www.politico.com/story/2018/0...to-know-635005

If you were Trump. What would you offer Kim to give up his nuclear weapons program? What would you offer to reunite the Two Korea's?

Oldtimr 06-11-2018 02:25 AM

I would offer to allow him to live!

cr422 06-11-2018 02:44 AM


Originally Posted by Oldtimr (Post 4336758)
I would offer to allow him to live!

That could be a start.

Reunification is not going to happen for a long, long time. As I have mentioned before, North Korea, not China, not Russia, invaded, and devastated, South Korea. It's not something that gets publicized, but when you talk with South Koreans, there is considerable hostility towards the North. It's probably not as bad now, but there was a time when North Koreans who managed to sneak across the border would pretend they were born in South Korea.

Alsatian 06-11-2018 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by cr422 (Post 4336759)
That could be a start.

Reunification is not going to happen for a long, long time. As I have mentioned before, North Korea, not China, not Russia, invaded, and devastated, South Korea. It's not something that gets publicized, but when you talk with South Koreans, there is considerable hostility towards the North. It's probably not as bad now, but there was a time when North Koreans who managed to sneak across the border would pretend they were born in South Korea.

I have a dissenting opinion. Hopefully I express my dissent respectfully and avoid giving offense. That is not my intention. Also, as a caveat, this is just my opinion and I have been wrong before.

I think the main obstacle to the North reuniting with the South is not animosity between the peoples of North Korea and South Korea. I think the obstacle is that the regime in the North would lose its prerogatives and possibly even be persecuted in the aftermath of union. Thus, the regime in North Korea would be committing suicide to countenance reunification. There are plenty of people in South Korea who have family members who were stuck in the North after the truce was initiated. They really want to be reunited. More than many other peoples, Koreans are culturally distinct and hence ought to be united. Their language is distinct. Their culture and history are distinct.

Having said that, I do agree reunification is not going to happen any time soon, although that is a tragedy. Notwithstanding, reunification WILL happen in the future. How can I say this with such certainty? Because it is destined by the inherent cultural unity of Korea.

What will Trump angle for in these talks? I don't know. Let's wait and see. I think Trump walking away with no progress is NOT the worst thing that could happen. If that happened -- nothing accomplished by the meeting -- that could provide justification for applying further pressure on the North, that could provide justification for some other substantive action on the part of the US. I don't know what form such "substantive action" could take, but robust military action may be a substantive action. Is that wise? I am in no good position to evaluate that. I will point out from Machiavelli's "The Prince" Chapter III: "The Romans never allowed disorders to increase in order to avoid a war; for they knew that war is not to be avoided, and can be deferred only to the advantage of the other side." We know of things in our own recent history that agree with the wisdom of this insight. To their detriment, France and England "allowed disorders to increase in order to avoid a war" during the rise of Hitler. All that accomplished was to contribute to the advantage of the other side.

Mickey Finn 06-11-2018 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by Alsatian (Post 4336775)
I have a dissenting opinion. Hopefully I express my dissent respectfully and avoid giving offense. That is not my intention. Also, as a caveat, this is just my opinion and I have been wrong before.

I think the main obstacle to the North reuniting with the South is not animosity between the peoples of North Korea and South Korea. I think the obstacle is that the regime in the North would lose its prerogatives and possibly even be persecuted in the aftermath of union. Thus, the regime in North Korea would be committing suicide to countenance reunification. There are plenty of people in South Korea who have family members who were stuck in the North after the truce was initiated. They really want to be reunited. More than many other peoples, Koreans are culturally distinct and hence ought to be united. Their language is distinct. Their culture and history are distinct.

Having said that, I do agree reunification is not going to happen any time soon, although that is a tragedy. Notwithstanding, reunification WILL happen in the future. How can I say this with such certainty? Because it is destined by the inherent cultural unity of Korea.

What will Trump angle for in these talks? I don't know. Let's wait and see. I think Trump walking away with no progress is NOT the worst thing that could happen. If that happened -- nothing accomplished by the meeting -- that could provide justification for applying further pressure on the North, that could provide justification for some other substantive action on the part of the US. I don't know what form such "substantive action" could take, but robust military action may be a substantive action. Is that wise? I am in no good position to evaluate that. I will point out from Machiavelli's "The Prince" Chapter III: "The Romans never allowed disorders to increase in order to avoid a war; for they knew that war is not to be avoided, and can be deferred only to the advantage of the other side." We know of things in our own recent history that agree with the wisdom of this insight. To their detriment, France and England "allowed disorders to increase in order to avoid a war" during the rise of Hitler. All that accomplished was to contribute to the advantage of the other side.

It's true Dictatorships do not fair well when there is an upheaval. Maybe China would be willing to offer sanctuary to Kim and his family.
Or let him meet his fate at the hands of his victims.

Besides that military intervention on a large enough scale to bring about an upheaval is not likely. So that leaves peaceful means. Kim could capitulate on his nuclear program in exchange for trade goods which his people need desperately. I'm pretty sure we would accommodate that. If he walks away with nothing which is likely. He should be made to understand the negotiating table is still available. Though it's not likely another audience with Trump will happen. He could after having tested the waters return to come to an agreement with the west.

flags 06-12-2018 05:01 AM

I find it funny that all the DEMs like Broom Hilda, Chuckles, Piglosi etc... are all chiming in telling Trump how to handle this historic summit when not one of them could ever get it set up in the first place. The broadcast their ineptness and then want to act like they know what is going on. Typical LIBs.

Mickey Finn 06-12-2018 07:24 AM


Originally Posted by flags (Post 4336818)
I find it funny that all the DEMs like Broom Hilda, Chuckles, Piglosi etc... are all chiming in telling Trump how to handle this historic summit when not one of them could ever get it set up in the first place. The broadcast their ineptness and then want to act like they know what is going on. Typical LIBs.

Maybe it takes a wild card.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.