Movement to normalize perversion continues
07-13-2015, 08:47 AM
#51
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,283
Originally Posted by waddler
People touting their superior morality should take care not to break their arm while patting themselves on the back.
Last edited by ipscshooter; 07-13-2015 at 09:11 AM.
07-13-2015, 10:56 AM
#52
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bogart Georgia/Hunter Arkansas
Posts: 360
Originally Posted by ipscshooter
There aren't any patting themselves on the back here. It's really not much of an accomplishment to achieve moral superiority over the leftist elements of today's society...
Last edited by CalHunter; 07-13-2015 at 01:44 PM. Reason: Rules 2, 8 & 12--3rd strike--1-day timeout.
07-13-2015, 01:36 PM
#53
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 17,557
Originally Posted by waddler
Gonna hide? What about the morality of outlawing abortion and then taking away sustenance for the child because the parents are low class immorality? What about the morality of sentencing an unborn child to a life of destitution. Is that the morality so highly thought of?
Want to hide from that reality also?
Want to hide from that reality also?
In the first emboldened statement, you make it sound like both decisions are made for exactly the same reason(s) and are irrevocably linked and intertwined. If that is so, then couldn't you also ask the question in reverse (using your above format): What about the morality of taking away sustenance for the child because the parents are low class immorality and then outlawing abortion?
Your 2nd emboldened statement from above quote is even more curious. To wit "What about the morality of sentencing an unborn child to a life of destitution." I fail to see exactly how an unborn child (who is obviously not aborted) is "sentenced" to a "life of destitution."
Could you explain how you arrive at such a negative conclusion? What study do you base this on? Or even just some reasonable inference from some personal experience? So far, Ranger77 seems to have refuted your assertion with at least his own personal experience. I would guess that many others could also. At minimum, with such anecdotal personal experiences contrary to your theory or formula (I like assertion better though), it would seem that your assertion is not always accurate and would therefore need further study, or in your case, documentation, etc.
Last edited by CalHunter; 07-14-2015 at 07:34 AM. Reason: Clarity
07-13-2015, 01:43 PM
#54
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Iowa (Heartland USA)
Posts: 3,249
Waddler is nothing more than a liberal Theophobe who would rather blame a pregnancy on an unborn child than hold the parents responsible for their actions. He is one of those who claim an unborn child is not a human and in the same breathe claim that unborn child while not human is already either gay or heterosexual before birth too. When he does not have an defendable response he claims his counter is uttering worthless nonsense.
Yep, pretty much everyone on here is wrong and only Waddler is correct. Talk about patting yourself on your back...
Yep, pretty much everyone on here is wrong and only Waddler is correct. Talk about patting yourself on your back...
07-13-2015, 02:14 PM
#55
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 17,557
He'll need a day before he can respond but I'm curious as to his response and/or answer(s). I realize people with challenged upbringing can have a greater chance for destitution but it is not a 100% given outcome. Interestingly, with our increased social safety nets, it is becoming a more likely (higher %) outcome but it still isn't a given. I don't think it's out of line to request some facts and documentation to back up his assertion or theory. 
07-13-2015, 02:19 PM
#56
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 13,261
There is no safety net, it has evolved into a hammock! Professional bums, malingerers and drones all love that hammock! So do the liberal scum that gave it to them. If you want to keep people poor, don't make them labor for their dinner, they will lick your face and love you and hate those who want to turn off the spigot free money.
Last edited by Oldtimr; 07-13-2015 at 02:26 PM.
