Fieldmouse

Huh, you all are incapable of discussing anything. You lack substance every time because neater of you ever do your homework. It's why you throw crap out there, get called on it and just move on to the next topic. You can't have a simple discussion because you're followers.

stormyday395

I will have any conversation you want to have FM. Why don't you read the article that NW posted. Its fact, been known for along time. Your just having trouble defending it.

flags

I see the other half of the Brainless Duo showed up right on schedule. Doesn't suprise me. Can't help but notice he doesn't actually provide any interesting input other than lip action. Something tells me that he and NW are one and the same.

stormyday395

why don't you post something constuctive on the point NW was making? I don't know the guy or gal, but he or she makes since. So respond with your take on it.

Fieldmouse

Defending what, 2 nuts going on a killing spree? What's there to defend?

JagMagMan

NW and his alter-ego Stormy can't defend that most of the "nut jobs," like the Millers are way out in left field!
GOP leaning Conservatives don't cry on You Tube and then go out and murder people in cold blood, claiming they are fighting against the "establishment!"
And that they are dying as "martyrs" for "the cause!"
When in truth they are spine-less, gut-less, spoiled brats, indoctrinated by the liberal system!
But then, NW, Stormy and the rest of the socialist's gang want to say that we are just "clinging to our guns and bibles," when all we want to do is to ensure that America lives by our Constitution that so much honorable blood was shed for!

homers brother

Okay, so this is pretty clear. The article you cite was written on April 19th. The two officers were murdered ... when?

And you jump to the conclusion somehow that all militia members should be executed from that? I've seen some leaps of logic before, but this one's just about the worst. Do you really harbor so much hate in your heart that you'd say something like that? I think most of us right-wing nuts have more to worry about from you and like-minded progressives than you have to worry about from us.

That you'd openly call for the deaths of other Americans because they don't believe in what you do? Really? There's just something wrong with that kind of thinking.

nodog

it's a powder keg.

What kind of message is sent when people add to the fire by advocating the government should shoot on site anyone who is like the people out west?

The kind of people who want a war to start and will never be any where near it. This kind of stiring people up is not new. It almost always works.

ckell

Cal the big red letters were so it could be seen as something I posted, and added to yours. and not a continuance of yours.

It was more of a attempt at humor as much as an observation, of the guy on the bridge/overpass. A duh moment, maybe someone said hay lay down there and look like you are aiming at something, and He said duh ok, how does this look? Because like you said I did notice his aim was, maybe a little high there. The gun a little level for an elevated position. His head appears to be just a bit high above the sights as well. Eyes a little higher than the rear sight, more like look over the sights over and down the barrel. Like you said we can not see what he sees down the sights. That is why my opinion is it may be more of a duh photo opportunity, making me think he was more pointing a gun in an unsafe direction, for the picture, than actually aiming at anything Duh don't this look cool? But at least he did not have a finger on the trigger.

The other guy who was standing, another posed picture opportunity. Duh does this look cool or what. Some of us are leaning to the or what, were you thinking opinion. So to me it looks like maybe both where posed photo opportunities, duh how does this look, looks good, this should get a million hits on u tube or something, ain't that cool, duh yeah. But even in their Duh moments none of them had a finger on a trigger.

The officer pointing the rifle at the driver, just saying we don't know what he saw in the car. And may be in the instant that picture was taken the Officer on the other side had not reacted yet. Just In my mind there must have been some reason we can not see for that posture. May be not, but I tend to have a little more faith in LE than to do such a thing with cameras everywhere.

CalHunter

I agree with that. It's hard to to draw conclusions from just solo pictures when there's usually so much more to the story. I hadn't considered the Bundy group just posing for pictures since that would be such a "duh" moment but it kinda makes sense when you think about it. I was surprised to see that so many people on both sides showed such restraint in the pictures. I will be curious to read the final report on this incident.