GOP just keeps making it easier
03-07-2014, 12:10 PM
#71
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,225
Originally Posted by Lunkerdog
I've been chuckling myself... Have also been chuckling at the former NAHC members that haven't figured out who you are yet
03-07-2014, 12:10 PM
#72
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: northeast
Posts: 115
No Ckell..but gosh I miss seeing her..RT gave me a site that he said she was on but couldn't get on it for some reason. My daughter lives down by her. They actually work in the same town/city
Badger1..close enough..
Badger1..close enough..
Last edited by LBADG; 03-07-2014 at 12:23 PM.
03-07-2014, 12:30 PM
#73
Typical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by flags
Well, I've been a life member of NAHC since 1993 and was pretty active on the forum until they screwed it up. I'm going to guess LBADG stands for Lady BADGer, which would align with a poster on NAHC. How did I do?
Originally Posted by LBADG
No Ckell..but gosh I miss seeing her..RT gave me a site that he said she was on but couldn't get on it for some reason. My daughter lives down by her. They actually work in the same town/city
Badger1..close enough..
Badger1..close enough..
03-07-2014, 12:35 PM
#74
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,058
I'll have to disagree with John McCain's tirade against blocking military commanders from sexual assault cases. I believe that McCain claimed that such a law would be detrimental to the leadership abilities of the commanders themselves, if such a law was passed.
Apparently...McCain's testimony and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina --- "It will not get us to the promised land of having fewer sexual assaults." --- and extreme pressure from the Pentagon --- swung the tide of votes against the measure. I'll have to agree with Ms. Gillibrand's supporter's, that say, "Because commander's, often know both the victims and the accused abusers, victims shy away from reporting abuse. Military commanders have not proven themselves able to deal with the issue."
The new legislation proposed --- "The Senate agreed, 100-0, which calls for a civilian review if a prosecutor and commander disagree over whether to litigate a sexual assault case." In my opinion...this new proposal is doomed to failure, because basically --- it has no teeth --- which also shows the disunity in our Federal government's failure to lead our country.
Quotes: New York Times
Apparently...McCain's testimony and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina --- "It will not get us to the promised land of having fewer sexual assaults." --- and extreme pressure from the Pentagon --- swung the tide of votes against the measure. I'll have to agree with Ms. Gillibrand's supporter's, that say, "Because commander's, often know both the victims and the accused abusers, victims shy away from reporting abuse. Military commanders have not proven themselves able to deal with the issue."
The new legislation proposed --- "The Senate agreed, 100-0, which calls for a civilian review if a prosecutor and commander disagree over whether to litigate a sexual assault case." In my opinion...this new proposal is doomed to failure, because basically --- it has no teeth --- which also shows the disunity in our Federal government's failure to lead our country.
Quotes: New York Times
Last edited by Erno86; 03-07-2014 at 12:56 PM. Reason: added a sentence
03-07-2014, 01:07 PM
#75
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,718
Originally Posted by Erno86
I'll have to disagree with John McCain's tirade against blocking military commanders from sexual assault cases. I believe that McCain claimed that such a law would be detrimental to the leadership abilities of the commanders themselves, if such a law was passed.
Apparently...McCain's testimony and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina --- "It will not get us to the promised land of having fewer sexual assaults." --- and extreme pressure from the Pentagon --- swung the tide of votes against the measure. I'll have to agree with Ms. Gillibrand's supporter's, that say, "Because commander's, often know both the victims and the accused abusers, victims shy away from reporting abuse. Military commanders have not proven themselves able to deal with the issue."
The new legislation proposed --- "The Senate agreed, 100-0, which calls for a civilian review if a prosecutor and commander disagree over whether to litigate a sexual assault case." In my opinion...this new proposal is doomed to failure, because basically --- it has no teeth --- which also shows the disunity in our Federal government's failure to lead our country.
Quotes: New York Times
Apparently...McCain's testimony and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina --- "It will not get us to the promised land of having fewer sexual assaults." --- and extreme pressure from the Pentagon --- swung the tide of votes against the measure. I'll have to agree with Ms. Gillibrand's supporter's, that say, "Because commander's, often know both the victims and the accused abusers, victims shy away from reporting abuse. Military commanders have not proven themselves able to deal with the issue."
The new legislation proposed --- "The Senate agreed, 100-0, which calls for a civilian review if a prosecutor and commander disagree over whether to litigate a sexual assault case." In my opinion...this new proposal is doomed to failure, because basically --- it has no teeth --- which also shows the disunity in our Federal government's failure to lead our country.
Quotes: New York Times
03-07-2014, 01:20 PM
#76
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: northeast
Posts: 115
but found a new pot stirer.
Nah...just bored...actually just read through some of the posts. They have given me a headache and bothered my stomach...such underlying disdain and hostility.
I have to keep reminding my self that I really do understand. That it is human nature to be fearful. When faced with the knowledge ppl can live and thrive, be productive and caring lovable humans, when they do not share in the same beliefs or life paths that you have grown up with and cling to . Ones that have been your only reality.
It is a fear that I can understand. To have some feeling that, some how other ppls successfully maneuvering life's roads differently than them, diminishes their own path. That successful thoughts other than their own, diminishes how they think, so they lash out.It's just human nature. It's fear.
03-07-2014, 01:26 PM
#77
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,718
Originally Posted by LBADG
Nah...just bored...actually just read through some of the posts. They have given me a headache and bothered my stomach...such underlying disdain and hostility.
I have to keep reminding my self that I really do understand. That it is human nature to be fearful. When faced with the knowledge ppl can live and thrive, be productive and caring lovable humans, when they do not share in the same beliefs or life paths that you have grown up with and cling to . Ones that have been your only reality.
It is a fear that I can understand. To have some feeling that, some how other ppls successfully maneuvering life's roads differently than them, diminishes their own path. That successful thoughts other than their own, diminishes how they think, so they lash out.It's just human nature. It's fear.
I have to keep reminding my self that I really do understand. That it is human nature to be fearful. When faced with the knowledge ppl can live and thrive, be productive and caring lovable humans, when they do not share in the same beliefs or life paths that you have grown up with and cling to . Ones that have been your only reality.
It is a fear that I can understand. To have some feeling that, some how other ppls successfully maneuvering life's roads differently than them, diminishes their own path. That successful thoughts other than their own, diminishes how they think, so they lash out.It's just human nature. It's fear.
We will try this once again but you keep changing the subject and trying to make this about me. Try to remain focus on the topics you choose to opine on but failed to back up when challenged.
What rights do gays not enjoy that I enjoy?
03-07-2014, 01:26 PM
#78
Typical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by LBADG
Nah...just bored...actually just read through some of the posts. They have given me a headache and bothered my stomach...such underlying disdain and hostility.
I have to keep reminding my self that I really do understand. That it is human nature to be fearful. When faced with the knowledge ppl can live and thrive, be productive and caring lovable humans, when they do not share in the same beliefs or life paths that you have grown up with and cling to . Ones that have been your only reality.
It is a fear that I can understand. To have some feeling that, some how other ppls successfully maneuvering life's roads differently than them, diminishes their own path. That successful thoughts other than their own, diminishes how they think, so they lash out.It's just human nature. It's fear.
I have to keep reminding my self that I really do understand. That it is human nature to be fearful. When faced with the knowledge ppl can live and thrive, be productive and caring lovable humans, when they do not share in the same beliefs or life paths that you have grown up with and cling to . Ones that have been your only reality.
It is a fear that I can understand. To have some feeling that, some how other ppls successfully maneuvering life's roads differently than them, diminishes their own path. That successful thoughts other than their own, diminishes how they think, so they lash out.It's just human nature. It's fear.
03-07-2014, 01:35 PM
#80
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37,718
Originally Posted by LBADG
Here you go they do not enjoy the same legal state sanctioned ability to form a family unit under the eyes of the law in many states.
OMG you just may strangle your self twisting this one..Go!
OMG you just may strangle your self twisting this one..Go!
So let's try this again, what right do they not have that I have?
