Art paid for by your tax dollar. Anti Christian crap.
12-04-2010, 11:44 AM
#31
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 15,296
HB, you know and I know that the above is nothing but a double-speak excuse.
A check from the Smithsonian pays for the water, power, and upkeep. A check from the Smithsonian pays these freaks to display their "art", even against the will of the majority (sounds like the Smithsonian is run by democrats).
It's the same 'ol same 'ol blatent hypocracy. If a Christian group were to sponsor a Nativity scene on federal property, although there's not one penny of taxpayer money spent on the scene itself, do you think that would make it all hunky-dory to the aclu?
It's along the lines of using the kkk to represent Christians. Not anywhere near as ridiculous and dishonest, but along the same lines.
A check from the Smithsonian pays for the water, power, and upkeep. A check from the Smithsonian pays these freaks to display their "art", even against the will of the majority (sounds like the Smithsonian is run by democrats).
It's the same 'ol same 'ol blatent hypocracy. If a Christian group were to sponsor a Nativity scene on federal property, although there's not one penny of taxpayer money spent on the scene itself, do you think that would make it all hunky-dory to the aclu?
It's along the lines of using the kkk to represent Christians. Not anywhere near as ridiculous and dishonest, but along the same lines.
12-04-2010, 12:22 PM
#32
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 12,560
Originally Posted by Beau Ouiville
Rev, you made an ignorant, bigoted comment. No two ways about it. You should deal with that fact, not the accuser.
Your off your rocker, I'm not a bigot, I have a color tv.
How that's funny I don't care who you are.. Get er did!
12-05-2010, 12:21 AM
#34
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 12,560
Originally Posted by Beau Ouiville
I didn't say you were a bigot, Rev. Deal with the issue.
My bad!
.Beau, thanks you make my day. If it weren't for you and VC this forum would be a little boring.
12-05-2010, 08:16 AM
#35
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,431
Originally Posted by LBR
HB, you know and I know that the above is nothing but a double-speak excuse.
A check from the Smithsonian pays for the water, power, and upkeep. A check from the Smithsonian pays these freaks to display their "art", even against the will of the majority (sounds like the Smithsonian is run by democrats).
It's the same 'ol same 'ol blatent hypocracy. If a Christian group were to sponsor a Nativity scene on federal property, although there's not one penny of taxpayer money spent on the scene itself, do you think that would make it all hunky-dory to the aclu?
It's along the lines of using the kkk to represent Christians. Not anywhere near as ridiculous and dishonest, but along the same lines.
A check from the Smithsonian pays for the water, power, and upkeep. A check from the Smithsonian pays these freaks to display their "art", even against the will of the majority (sounds like the Smithsonian is run by democrats).
It's the same 'ol same 'ol blatent hypocracy. If a Christian group were to sponsor a Nativity scene on federal property, although there's not one penny of taxpayer money spent on the scene itself, do you think that would make it all hunky-dory to the aclu?
It's along the lines of using the kkk to represent Christians. Not anywhere near as ridiculous and dishonest, but along the same lines.
12-05-2010, 08:22 AM
#36
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Originally Posted by cr422
Absolutely! Federal funds contribute to these displays, Because without that money, the Smithsonian would be out of business and there would be no displays.
12-05-2010, 08:55 AM
#37
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,431
Originally Posted by halfbakedi420
anyway ya look at it the government only pays fer 65% of the funding..45% comes from private donations....how hard is this to understand? maybe its a conspiracy?
I'm going to back out now. I've just realized that I've broken our rule about double-teaming on a thread. Stephanie practiced with her muzzleloader yesterday and is now cleaning it with soap and water and making some soup. I hope she doesn't mix up the two.
If you have a color TV but don't have cable, are you still not a bigot?
12-05-2010, 09:05 AM
#39
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Originally Posted by cr422
Some of us, my wife and I for instance, don't want to pay for 65% of the funding to display this kind of garbage.
I'm going to back out now. I've just realized that I've broken our rule about double-teaming on a thread. Stephanie practiced with her muzzleloader yesterday and is now cleaning it with soap and water and making some soup. I hope she doesn't mix up the two.
If you have a color TV but don't have cable, are you still not a bigot?
I'm going to back out now. I've just realized that I've broken our rule about double-teaming on a thread. Stephanie practiced with her muzzleloader yesterday and is now cleaning it with soap and water and making some soup. I hope she doesn't mix up the two.
If you have a color TV but don't have cable, are you still not a bigot?
